Gloor H O, Urthaler F
Am J Physiol. 1983 Jan;244(1):H80-8. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.1983.244.1.H80.
The l- and d-isomers of verapamil were selectively perfused into the sinus node artery and atrioventricular (AV) node artery of 48 dogs. Injection of l-verapamil into the sinus node artery during sinus rhythm and into the AV node artery during AV junctional rhythm depresses both sinus rhythm and AV junctional rhythm significantly more than does the d-isomer. l-Verapamil is three to four times more powerful than d-verapamil. Injection of the isomers into the AV node artery during sinus rhythm rapidly impairs AV conduction. Increments in conduction time are measured exclusively at the level of the A-H interval of the His bundle electrogram, and l-verapamil is six times more powerful than d-verapamil. Neither d- nor l-verapamil in concentrations that exert a profound negative chronotropic effect or cause AV block, has any significant effect on transatrial or His bundle conduction. Thus these concentrations of d-verapamil have little or no significant effect on the fast sodium channel, but both verapamil isomers affect the slow channel. The main difference in action between l- and d-verapamil appears to be only quantitative in nature. The sinus node is significantly more sensitive to the negative chronotropic action of verapamil than is the AV junctional pacemaker, and this differential responsiveness appears to be related to the different intrinsic rates of the two pacemakers. During sinus rhythm (either in the presence or absence of atropine) sinus node automaticity is less affected than AV conduction when verapamil is given parenterally. We propose that this greater negative dromotropic effect of verapamil is also in part due to a rate-dependent process, since during sinus rhythm AV junctional cells have to be depolarized at frequencies significantly higher than their intrinsic rates.
将维拉帕米的左旋体和右旋体分别选择性地灌注到48只犬的窦房结动脉和房室(AV)结动脉中。在窦性心律时将左旋维拉帕米注入窦房结动脉,在房室交界性心律时注入房室结动脉,其对窦性心律和房室交界性心律的抑制作用明显比右旋体更强。左旋维拉帕米的效力比右旋维拉帕米强三到四倍。在窦性心律时将这两种异构体注入房室结动脉会迅速损害房室传导。传导时间的增加仅在希氏束电图的A-H间期水平进行测量,左旋维拉帕米的效力比右旋维拉帕米强六倍。无论是右旋还是左旋维拉帕米,在产生显著负性变时作用或导致房室传导阻滞的浓度下,对经心房或希氏束传导均无明显影响。因此,这些浓度的右旋维拉帕米对快钠通道几乎没有或没有明显影响,但两种维拉帕米异构体均影响慢通道。左旋和右旋维拉帕米作用的主要差异似乎仅在数量上。窦房结对维拉帕米的负性变时作用比房室交界性起搏点更敏感,这种不同的反应性似乎与两个起搏点不同的固有频率有关。在窦性心律期间(无论有无阿托品),静脉给予维拉帕米时,窦房结自律性比房室传导受影响小。我们认为,维拉帕米这种更大的负性传导作用部分也是由于速率依赖性过程,因为在窦性心律期间,房室交界性细胞必须以明显高于其固有频率的频率去极化。