Boucher B J, Burrin J M, Gould B J, John P N, Lewis G, Owens C, Paisey R, Pennock C A, Poon P Y, Ross I S, Welch S G, White J M
Diabetologia. 1983 Apr;24(4):265-71. doi: 10.1007/BF00282711.
A collaborative study compared methods for measuring glycosylated haemoglobin in seven laboratories in the United Kingdom. No satisfactory standard for general use was found. Satisfactory internal quality control systems were in use for each assay which allowed the maintenance of a normal range in each participating laboratory. No satisfactory quality control system suitable for general use could be identified. Costs and convenience of the assays are reported. The technical problems with each type of assay and precautions for their use were identified, such as the need for standardization in incubation times, the practicability of automation of colorimetric assays, and the precision of pH needed for buffers in column separation methods. The relevance of the technical problems to interpretation of measurements is also considered. It is concluded that laboratories measuring glycosylated haemoglobin should maintain a normal range, use 'in-house' quality controls to monitor assay performance and keep clinical colleagues informed of the findings and of any changes in methodology that might affect the interpretation of results.
一项合作研究比较了英国七个实验室测量糖化血红蛋白的方法。未找到通用的令人满意的标准。每个检测方法都采用了令人满意的内部质量控制系统,这使得每个参与实验室都能维持正常范围。未确定适合通用的令人满意的质量控制系统。报告了检测方法的成本和便利性。确定了每种检测方法的技术问题及其使用注意事项,例如孵育时间标准化的必要性、比色法自动化的可行性以及柱分离法中缓冲液所需pH值的精度。还考虑了技术问题与测量结果解释的相关性。结论是,测量糖化血红蛋白的实验室应维持正常范围,使用“内部”质量控制来监测检测性能,并让临床同事了解检测结果以及可能影响结果解释的方法学上的任何变化。