Lohr K N, Brook R H
Ann Intern Med. 1980 Jan;92(1):99-106. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-92-1-99.
As part of ambulatory-care review, the New Mexico Experimental Medical Care Review Organization (EMCRO) developed medical guidelines for the use of injections and informed physicians about them through written communications and personal visits. After their adoption, the EMCRO denied payment for Medicaid claims not meeting the guidelines. To study the effect of these activities, we compared quality of care in entire episodes of respiratory infections before and after guidelines were promulgated. Quality as judged by minimal criteria for antibiotic use improved. Percentages of episodes with appropriate therapy rose from 36% to 42% for streptococcal sore throat, from 42% to 81% for bronchitis, and from 36% to 51% for acute upper respiratory infection. Quality improved most among physicians with the poorest records initially; "outliers" still gave inadequate care. Assessment of episodes of care derived from claims data thus appears to be a feasible and nonintrusive mechanism for detecting deficiencies in quality and evaluating quality-assurance activities.
作为门诊医疗审查的一部分,新墨西哥州实验医疗审查组织(EMCRO)制定了注射使用的医学指南,并通过书面沟通和个人拜访让医生了解这些指南。指南采用后,EMCRO拒绝为不符合指南的医疗补助申请付款。为研究这些活动的效果,我们比较了指南颁布前后整个呼吸道感染病程中的医疗质量。根据抗生素使用的最低标准判断,医疗质量有所提高。链球菌性咽喉炎适当治疗的病程百分比从36%升至42%,支气管炎从42%升至81%,急性上呼吸道感染从36%升至51%。最初记录最差的医生中医疗质量改善最为明显;“异常值”医生提供的护理仍不充分。因此,从申请数据得出的护理病程评估似乎是检测质量缺陷和评估质量保证活动的一种可行且非侵入性的机制。