Ali M, Nalebuff D J, Fadai R, Fayemi A O
Ann Allergy. 1980 Aug;45(2):63-6.
The results of the diagnostic skin test are correlated with those obtained with an immunoperoxidase (IP) assay in 17 patients with positive histories for ragweed hay fever. The IP assay, a version of the ELISA technique, employs polystyrene microtiter plates as the solid-phase, horseradish peroxidase as the enzymatic label and O-phenylene diamine as the enzyme substrate. Concordance between the results of these two diagnostic techniques was observed in 66 patients (86%). Among the 11 patients with discordant results the modified RAST test was in agreement with the IP assay in seven and with the diagnostic skin test in four patients. In these latter four patients ragweed-specific IgE antibodies were detected by the IP or the modified RAST assays in low titers. The coefficients of variation for the IP assay ranged from 8% to 14.3%. The pros and cons of the use in vitro tests (the IP and the RAST test) and the diagnostic skin test in clinical practice of allergy are discussed.
对17例豚草花粉热病史阳性的患者,将诊断性皮肤试验结果与免疫过氧化物酶(IP)测定结果进行了对比。IP测定是酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)技术的一种形式,它采用聚苯乙烯微量滴定板作为固相,辣根过氧化物酶作为酶标记物,邻苯二胺作为酶底物。这两种诊断技术的结果在66例患者(86%)中表现出一致性。在11例结果不一致的患者中,改良RAST试验与IP测定结果一致的有7例,与诊断性皮肤试验结果一致的有4例。在这后4例患者中,IP或改良RAST测定以低滴度检测到了豚草特异性IgE抗体。IP测定的变异系数在8%至14.3%之间。讨论了体外试验(IP和RAST试验)及诊断性皮肤试验在临床变态反应实践中的优缺点。