Jensen S, Schou-Olesen A, Hüttel M S
Br J Anaesth. 1982 Jun;54(6):605-7. doi: 10.1016/s0007-0912(17)46813-9.
A prospective, randomized, single-blind investigation was undertaken into the value of midazolam as an agent for the induction of anaesthesia. Sixty patients undergoing orthopaedic surgery of short duration were allocated randomly to receive either midazolam 0.2 mg kg-1 or thiopentone 3 mg kg-1. The induction time (measured as the time until loss of eyelash reflex) in the thiopentone group was significantly shorter than in the midazolam group. No differences were observed between the two drugs as regards time to onset of apnoea, or changes in heart rate and arterial pressure.
开展了一项前瞻性、随机、单盲研究,以探讨咪达唑仑作为麻醉诱导剂的价值。60例接受短期骨科手术的患者被随机分配,分别接受0.2mg/kg咪达唑仑或3mg/kg硫喷妥钠。硫喷妥钠组的诱导时间(以睫毛反射消失时间衡量)显著短于咪达唑仑组。在呼吸暂停开始时间、心率和动脉压变化方面,两种药物之间未观察到差异。