Suppr超能文献

钝性创伤患者腹内损伤的识别。一项比较体格检查与腹腔灌洗的前瞻性研究。

Recognition of intra-abdominal injury in blunt trauma victims. A prospective study comparing physical examination with peritoneal lavage.

作者信息

Rodriguez A, DuPriest R W, Shatney C H

出版信息

Am Surg. 1982 Sep;48(9):457-9.

PMID:7125378
Abstract

The accuracy of initial physical examination and peritoneal lavage in detecting intra-abdominal injury was assessed in 221 consecutive blunt trauma victims. Of the patients, 121 had negative peritoneal lavages, with one false result, and 100 had positive peritoneal lavages, including six false results and two injuries not requiring surgical correction. Hemoperitoneum occurred in 32 of 71 patients with a depressed sensorium and in 29 of 54 patients with thoracic injury. Twenty-eight of 120 patients with absent bowel tones and 20 of 100 patients with abdominal guarding or rigidity had negative peritoneal lavages. Among the 150 conscious, responsive patients there was a high incidence of false-positive and false-negative abdominal findings on physical examination. Hemoperitoneum was detected in four clinically negative patients. Significant error accompanies the initial abdominal examination and clinical assessment in the blunt trauma victim. In contract, open diagnostic peritoneal lavage is a sensitive and highly accurate test for blunt intraperitoneal injury. We believe peritoneal lavage is the single best test for intra-abdominal injury and should be performed in th majority of patients with such injuries.

摘要

对221例连续性钝性创伤患者进行了评估,以确定初次体格检查和腹腔灌洗在检测腹腔内损伤方面的准确性。这些患者中,121例腹腔灌洗结果为阴性,其中有1例假性结果;100例腹腔灌洗结果为阳性,包括6例假性结果和2例无需手术矫正的损伤。71例意识障碍患者中有32例发生血腹,54例胸部损伤患者中有29例发生血腹。120例肠鸣音消失的患者中有28例腹腔灌洗结果为阴性,100例有腹部压痛或肌紧张的患者中有20例腹腔灌洗结果为阴性。在150例意识清醒、反应灵敏的患者中,体格检查时腹部假阳性和假阴性结果的发生率很高。4例临床检查结果为阴性的患者检测出血腹。钝性创伤患者的初次腹部检查和临床评估存在显著误差。相比之下,开放性诊断性腹腔灌洗是检测钝性腹腔内损伤的一种敏感且高度准确的检查方法。我们认为腹腔灌洗是检测腹腔内损伤的最佳单一检查方法,大多数此类损伤患者都应进行该项检查。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验