Yamamoto K T, Smith W O
Biochim Biophys Acta. 1981 Mar 27;668(1):27-34. doi: 10.1016/0005-2795(81)90145-8.
Partially purified phytochrome from peas (Pisum sativum cv. Alaska) was absorbed to alkyl and omega-amino alkyl agaroses varying in the number of carbons in their alkyl chains from 2 to 10. The absorption and the elution of the absorbed phytochrome from them with KCl, KI, ethylene glycol and surfactants were investigated either in the dark or under red light in order to detect any chemical differences between the red-light-absorbing form of phytochrome (Pr) and the far-red-light-absorbing form of phytochrome (Pfr). With increasing alkyl chain length, more phytochrome was absorbed to the substituted agaroses. Phytochrome was absorbed to a greater extent by alkyl agaroses than by the less hydrophobic omega-amino alkyl agaroses. Absorbed Pfr was eluted by all the eluants tested to a lesser extent than the absorbed Pr. In those cases in which phytochrome could be eluted by KCl, a higher concentration was required to elute Pfr than Pr. As the chain length of the alkyl groups was increased, the difference in elution of Pr and Pfr by KCl increased. Phytochrome was salted out at a lesser concentration of ammonium sulfate after brief red-light irradiation than in the dark. Absorption of phytochrome to DEAE-agarose was also investigated as an example of ionic phytochrome-ligand interactions. The difference between the affinity of Pr and Pfr for DEAE-agarose was less than it was for omega-amino alkyl or alkyl agarose. It is concluded that Pfr is more hydrophobic than Pr.
从豌豆(阿拉斯加品种的豌豆,Pisum sativum cv. Alaska)中提取的部分纯化的光敏色素被吸附到烷基链碳原子数从2到10不等的烷基和ω-氨基烷基琼脂糖上。研究了在黑暗或红光条件下,用氯化钾、碘化钾、乙二醇和表面活性剂从这些吸附剂上吸附和洗脱光敏色素的情况,以检测光敏色素的红光吸收形式(Pr)和远红光吸收形式(Pfr)之间的任何化学差异。随着烷基链长度的增加,更多的光敏色素被吸附到取代琼脂糖上。与疏水性较弱的ω-氨基烷基琼脂糖相比,烷基琼脂糖对光敏色素的吸附程度更大。所有测试洗脱剂对吸附的Pfr的洗脱程度均低于对吸附的Pr的洗脱程度。在光敏色素能用氯化钾洗脱的情况下,洗脱Pfr所需的浓度高于洗脱Pr所需的浓度。随着烷基链长度的增加,氯化钾对Pr和Pfr的洗脱差异增大。短暂红光照射后,光敏色素在较低浓度的硫酸铵中盐析,而在黑暗中则不然。还研究了光敏色素对二乙氨基乙基琼脂糖(DEAE-琼脂糖)的吸附情况,作为离子型光敏色素-配体相互作用的一个例子。Pr和Pfr对DEAE-琼脂糖的亲和力差异小于它们对ω-氨基烷基或烷基琼脂糖的亲和力差异。得出的结论是,Pfr比Pr更疏水。