Schmitz R
Z Lymphol. 1981 Dec;5(2):112-7.
There are fundamental differences between a phlebological and a lymphological compression bandage. In venous congestion, the bandage reduces the edema; it is unable to do this to the same extent in lymphatic congestion. On the contrary, there it is only a link in a chain of measures. The actual reduction of the edema takes place by manual lymphatic drainage and instrumental expression. The intervals between the sessions are bridged over with the compression bandage. The requirement on the compression bandage in lymphatic edema is great firmness, i.e. high working pressure, but minimal resting pressure. This can be achieved technically either with gelatin of zinc or (in application of elastic bandages) by winding round many turns of the bandage with a slight pull. The material requirement is greater than with a phlebological bandage. On the other hand, cushioning is simpler. Care should be taken that the deep transverse folds near to the joint are bridged over with foam rubber in such a way that the bandage does not sink into them. The locking effect of the folds can thus be further intensified.
静脉学用压迫绷带和淋巴学用压迫绷带之间存在根本差异。在静脉充血时,绷带可减轻水肿;而在淋巴充血时,它无法达到同样的效果。相反,在淋巴充血时,它只是一系列措施中的一个环节。水肿的实际减轻是通过手法淋巴引流和器械挤压来实现的。疗程之间的间隔则用压迫绷带衔接。对于淋巴水肿的压迫绷带,要求是具有很强的紧实度,即高工作压力,但静息压力要最小。这在技术上可以通过锌明胶来实现,或者(在使用弹性绷带时)通过稍微拉伸绷带多缠绕几圈来实现。材料需求比静脉学用绷带更大。另一方面,缓冲则更简单。应注意用泡沫橡胶跨过靠近关节处的深横向褶皱,使绷带不会陷入其中。这样褶皱的锁定效果可以进一步增强。