Suppr超能文献

[用于职业指导目的的双眼视觉研究方法有用性的比较评估]

[Comparative evaluation of the usefulness of the methods of studying binocular vision for purposes of vocational guidance].

作者信息

Smolarz-Dudarewicz J, Poborc-Godlewska J, Leśnik H

出版信息

Med Pr. 1980;31(2):109-14.

PMID:7421562
Abstract

The deficiency of binocular vision calls for an absolute contraindication to perform a number of occupations. It is not easy to evaluate the binocular vision disturbance, especially in young people. Therefore it was decided to check the binocular vision by six methods and compare the results. Among 199 pupils of the seventh form of primary schools, the following binocular vision disturbances have been found: in 18% of subjects on stereometer, in 15% on a projector with polarizing glasses, in 14% lack of protective reflexes, in 13% on stereoscope, in 11,6% on synoptophore and lack of ambiopia after using the prism in 9% of subjects. All the tests yielded negative findings in 5,5% of subjects. The obtained data suggest that it is not enough to use just one method for a thorough determination of binocular vision.

摘要

双眼视觉缺陷是从事许多职业的绝对禁忌症。评估双眼视觉障碍并不容易,尤其是在年轻人中。因此,决定通过六种方法检查双眼视觉并比较结果。在199名小学七年级学生中,发现了以下双眼视觉障碍:18%的受试者在立体视仪上存在障碍,15%在使用偏光眼镜的投影仪上存在障碍,14%缺乏保护性反射,13%在实体镜上存在障碍,11.6%在同视机上存在障碍,9%的受试者在使用棱镜后不存在弱视。5.5%的受试者所有测试结果均为阴性。所得数据表明,仅使用一种方法来全面确定双眼视觉是不够的。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验