Soloff P H, Turner S M
J Nerv Ment Dis. 1981 Jan;169(1):37-44. doi: 10.1097/00005053-198101000-00005.
The clinical use of seclusion was studied prospectively on two acute treatment units of a university hospital. The incidence, frequency, duration, precipitant, and type of seclusion were documented for 59 secluded patients through 107 episodes and compared to 159 nonsecluded controls on a variety of demographic, diagnostic, and legal variables. Chronicity, legal status on admission, and race were patient characteristics correlated with the incidence of seclusion. Mental status and diagnosis were not significantly related to the incidence or the frequency of seclusion. Seclusion was used primarily to contain physical assault upon staff. There was no relationship between the precipitating event and duration of seclusion, nor any change in duration or restrictiveness of seclusion with repeated episodes. These findings differ markedly from previous reports. The clinical bias toward increased use of seclusion with committed, chronic, and black patients, as well as the independence of cause and duration of seclusion raise legal issues already being pursued in federal courts.
在一所大学医院的两个急性治疗单元对隔离的临床应用进行了前瞻性研究。记录了59名接受隔离患者的107次隔离事件的发生率、频率、持续时间、诱因和隔离类型,并在各种人口统计学、诊断和法律变量方面与159名未接受隔离的对照患者进行了比较。慢性病、入院时的法律状态和种族是与隔离发生率相关的患者特征。精神状态和诊断与隔离的发生率或频率没有显著关系。隔离主要用于控制对工作人员的人身攻击。诱发事件与隔离持续时间之间没有关系,且反复发生隔离事件时,隔离的持续时间或限制程度也没有任何变化。这些发现与之前的报告明显不同。对被监禁的、慢性疾病的和黑人患者增加使用隔离的临床倾向,以及隔离原因和持续时间的独立性引发了联邦法院已经在追究的法律问题。