Donaldson P T, Thomson L J, Heads A, Underhill J A, Vaughan R W, Rolando N, Williams R
Institute of Liver Studies, Kings College Hospital, London, UK.
Transplantation. 1995 Nov 15;60(9):1016-23.
Early studies in liver transplantation suggested that there was no association between graft outcome or rejection and the presence of alloantibodies before transplantation. More recent reports have suggested lower graft survival rates and a higher incidence of chronic rejection in patients with IgG warm-T crossmatches. In the present study, panel reactive antibody, direct crossmatch testing, and flow cytometry were used to detect preformed antibodies in sera from 158 consecutive adult recipients of first hepatic grafts. The relationship between preformed antidonor antibodies and liver allograft survival and rejection was determined. Twenty-six (17%) patients were panel reactive antibody (PRA)-positive before transplantation, 22 (15%) had positive donor-specific crossmatches, and 14 (9%) were positive by IgG-specific flow cytometry. Cumulative survival distribution and multivariate analysis failed to reveal any significant associations between overall graft survival and antibody status. Graft survival in patients with PRA-positive sera was 81% compared with 77% for those with PRA-negative sera, 68% for those with positive donor-specific crossmatches compared with 80% for those who were donor-specific crossmatch negative, and 79% for those who were antibody positive by flow cytometric analysis compared with 78% for those who were antibody negative. Subgroup analysis also failed to reveal any significant associations. In addition, Cox proportional hazards regression analysis failed to reveal a relationship between acute or chronic graft rejection with the presence or absence of preformed antibodies, irrespective of immunoglobulin class, cell type (T or non-T), specificity, or technique used for antibody detection. In conclusion, there appears to be no association between either donor-specific or "third-party" alloreactive IgG or IgM antibodies and liver transplant survival or rejection. These data do not indicate a need for prospective crossmatching of liver transplant recipients.
早期肝脏移植研究表明,移植前同种异体抗体的存在与移植物结局或排斥反应之间无关联。最近的报告显示,IgG 温 T 细胞交叉配型阳性的患者移植物存活率较低,慢性排斥反应发生率较高。在本研究中,采用群体反应性抗体检测、直接交叉配型试验和流式细胞术检测了 158 例连续接受首次肝脏移植的成年受者血清中的预存抗体。确定了预存抗供体抗体与肝脏同种异体移植物存活和排斥反应之间的关系。26 例(17%)患者移植前群体反应性抗体(PRA)阳性,22 例(15%)供体特异性交叉配型阳性,14 例(9%)IgG 特异性流式细胞术检测呈阳性。累积生存分布和多变量分析未能揭示总体移植物存活与抗体状态之间的任何显著关联。PRA 阳性血清患者的移植物存活率为 81%,而 PRA 阴性血清患者为 77%;供体特异性交叉配型阳性患者为 68%,供体特异性交叉配型阴性患者为 80%;流式细胞术分析抗体阳性患者为 79%,抗体阴性患者为 78%。亚组分析也未揭示任何显著关联。此外,Cox 比例风险回归分析未能揭示急性或慢性移植物排斥反应与预存抗体的有无之间的关系,无论免疫球蛋白类别、细胞类型(T 细胞或非 T 细胞)、特异性或用于抗体检测的技术如何。总之,供体特异性或“第三方”同种异体反应性 IgG 或 IgM 抗体与肝移植存活或排斥反应之间似乎无关联。这些数据表明无需对肝移植受者进行前瞻性交叉配型。