Simmons D R, Kingdom F A
McGill Vision Research, Department of Ophthalmology, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis. 1995 Oct;12(10):2094-104. doi: 10.1364/josaa.12.002094.
Contrast thresholds for stereoscopic depth identification (crossed or uncrossed) were measured as a function of disparity by use of isoluminant (red-green) and isochromatic (yellow-black) 0.5 cycles/deg Gabor patches. For the purposes of comparison, stimulus contrasts were scaled by their respective detection thresholds. The Gabor patches could be either vertically or horizontally oriented. It was found that the disparity dependence of the depth-identification contrast thresholds was similar for both chromatic and luminance patterns if the stimuli were vertically oriented, with the overall level of performance worse for the chromatic patterns by a factor of approximately 2 (6 dB). With horizontal patterns this difference was much larger, by a factor of approximately 7 (17 dB). These results suggest first that stereopsis in the absence of luminance cues is supported by a less-contrast-sensitive linear mechanism than that which supports stereopsis in the presence of luminance cues and second that the corresponding nonlinear chromatic stereo mechanism is either nonexistent or very weak. The implications of these data for previous studies of stereopsis at isoluminance is discussed.
通过使用等亮度(红-绿)和等色(黄-黑)、0.5 周/度的 Gabor 斑块,测量了立体深度识别(交叉或非交叉)的对比度阈值作为视差的函数。为了进行比较,刺激对比度按其各自的检测阈值进行缩放。Gabor 斑块可以是垂直或水平方向的。研究发现,如果刺激是垂直方向的,对于彩色和亮度模式,深度识别对比度阈值的视差依赖性相似,彩色模式的整体性能水平比亮度模式差约 2 倍(6 dB)。对于水平模式,这种差异要大得多,约为 7 倍(17 dB)。这些结果首先表明,在没有亮度线索的情况下,立体视觉由一种对比敏感度较低的线性机制支持,该机制比存在亮度线索时支持立体视觉的机制更不敏感,其次表明相应的非线性彩色立体机制要么不存在,要么非常微弱。讨论了这些数据对先前等亮度条件下立体视觉研究的影响。