Suppr超能文献

高剂量5-氨基水杨酸与6-甲基泼尼松龙治疗活动性克罗恩病回结肠型的比较:一项多中心随机双盲研究。德国5-氨基水杨酸研究组

Comparison between high dose 5-aminosalicylic acid and 6-methylprednisolone in active Crohn's ileocolitis. A multicenter randomized double-blind study. German 5-ASA Study Group.

作者信息

Gross V, Andus T, Fischbach W, Weber A, Gierend M, Hartmann F, Schölmerich J

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, University of Regensburg, Germany.

出版信息

Z Gastroenterol. 1995 Oct;33(10):581-4.

PMID:7502549
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The value of 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA) in Crohn's disease (CD) is still under discussion. In a previous study 2 g 5-ASA per day were inferior to a standard glucocorticoid treatment with 6-methylprednisolone (6-MPred) (Can J Gastroenterol 1990; 4: 446-51). In the present study we tested whether in active CD response rates to 4.5 g 5-ASA/day were not different from those to 6-MPred.

METHODS

Multicenter randomized double-blind double-dummy trial. 34 patients with active CD (CDAI > 150) were included. 17 patients were in the 5-ASA group (Salofalk, 4.5 g/day), 17 patients in the 6-MPred group (Urbason, initial dose 48 mg/day, weekly tapering). Duration of treatment was 8 weeks. Main outcome measure was remission of CD (CDAI < 150) and decrease of at least 60 points.

RESULTS

Both groups were comparable with respect to demographic and clinical parameters. The median CDAI decrease in the 5-ASA group was 85, in the 6-MPred group 122 (p = 0.7437). The median AUC of the CDAI in the 5-ASA group was 1027, in the 6-MPred group 950 (p = 0.137). The median AUC of the CDAI per treatment day was 22.94 in the 5-ASA group, and 17.33 in the 6-MPred group (p = 0.0555). On an intention-to-treat basis remission rates after 8 weeks were 40.0% in the 5-ASA group and 56.3% in the 6-MPred group (p = 0.5867).

CONCLUSIONS

Response rates to 5-ASA or 6-MPred were not significantly different although there was a trend towards a higher efficacy of 6-MPred. 5-ASA may be considered as alternative treatment in patients with activer CD who are intolerant to or refuse glucocorticoids.

摘要

背景

5-氨基水杨酸(5-ASA)在克罗恩病(CD)中的价值仍在讨论中。在之前的一项研究中,每天2克5-ASA的疗效不如标准的6-甲基泼尼松龙(6-MPred)糖皮质激素治疗(《加拿大胃肠病学杂志》1990年;4:446 - 51)。在本研究中,我们测试了在活动性CD中,每天4.5克5-ASA的缓解率是否与6-MPred的缓解率无差异。

方法

多中心随机双盲双模拟试验。纳入34例活动性CD患者(CDAI > 150)。17例患者在5-ASA组(莎尔福,4.5克/天),17例患者在6-MPred组(优舒龙,初始剂量48毫克/天,每周减量)。治疗持续时间为8周。主要结局指标是CD缓解(CDAI < 150)且至少降低60分。

结果

两组在人口统计学和临床参数方面具有可比性。5-ASA组CDAI的中位数下降为85,6-MPred组为122(p = 0.7437)。5-ASA组CDAI的中位数AUC为1027,6-MPred组为950(p = 0.137)。5-ASA组每治疗日CDAI的中位数AUC为22.94,6-MPred组为17.33(p = 0.0555)。在意向性分析的基础上,8周后的缓解率在5-ASA组为40.0%,在6-MPred组为56.3%(p = 0.5867)。

结论

尽管有6-MPred疗效更高的趋势,但5-ASA和6-MPred的缓解率无显著差异。5-ASA可被视为对糖皮质激素不耐受或拒绝使用糖皮质激素的活动性CD患者的替代治疗方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验