Suppr超能文献

孤立性甲状腺结节。触诊与超声检查的比较。

Solitary thyroid nodule. Comparison between palpation and ultrasonography.

作者信息

Tan G H, Gharib H, Reading C C

机构信息

Division of Endocrinology/Metabolism and Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn, USA.

出版信息

Arch Intern Med. 1995;155(22):2418-23. doi: 10.1001/archinte.155.22.2418.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine the accuracy of clinical palpation in the diagnosis of solitary thyroid nodule in comparison with ultrasonographic findings.

METHODS

From a computerized database of 1774 patients with the diagnosis of nodular thyroid disease made from January 1990 through December 1991 at our institution, we retrieved and reviewed the medical records of the 193 patients who underwent ultrasonography of the thyroid (42 patients with multinodular glands on palpation were excluded). Nodules were categorized as "solitary" or "dominant nodule of a multinodular gland." Concordance rates were measured between results of palpation and ultrasonographic findings.

RESULTS

Of 151 patients included in the study, 78 had solitary nodules on ultrasonography and 73 had multiple nodules. Of those with multiple nodules, 49 had two nodules and 24 had three or more nodules. Of clinically palpable nodules, 89% were 1 cm or greater in diameter. In 72% of the patients with multiple nodules, the other nodules not identified on palpation were less than 1 cm in diameter. The overall concordance rate between the size of the solitary nodule or the dominant nodule in a multinodular gland estimated with clinical palpation and the actual size seen on ultrasonography was 72%. The relationship between multiple nodules and malignancy was not statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that (1) a palpable solitary nodule represents a multinodular gland in about 50% of patients, (2) clinical palpation is less sensitive than thyroid ultrasonography in identifying multiple nodules, and (3) palpation is reliable only if a nodule is at least 1 cm in diameter. We recommend that small, occult (impalpable) thyroid nodules not be considered clinically important; they do not warrant further evaluation unless ultrasonographic features suggest malignancy or the nodule increases in size.

摘要

目的

与超声检查结果相比,确定临床触诊诊断甲状腺单发结节的准确性。

方法

从1990年1月至1991年12月在我院诊断为结节性甲状腺疾病的1774例患者的计算机数据库中,我们检索并回顾了193例行甲状腺超声检查患者的病历(触诊为多结节性腺体的42例患者被排除)。结节被分类为“单发”或“多结节性腺体的优势结节”。测量触诊结果与超声检查结果之间的符合率。

结果

纳入研究的151例患者中,超声检查显示78例为单发结节,73例为多发结节。在多发结节患者中,49例有两个结节,24例有三个或更多结节。临床可触及的结节中,89%直径≥1cm。在72%的多发结节患者中,触诊未发现的其他结节直径<1cm。临床触诊估计的单发结节或多结节性腺体优势结节的大小与超声实际所见大小之间的总体符合率为72%。多发结节与恶性肿瘤之间的关系无统计学意义。

结论

我们的结果表明,(1)大约50%的可触及单发结节患者实际上是多结节性腺体,(2)临床触诊在识别多发结节方面不如甲状腺超声敏感,(3)只有当结节直径至少为1cm时触诊才可靠。我们建议临床上不将小的、隐匿的(不可触及的)甲状腺结节视为重要情况;除非超声特征提示恶性或结节增大,否则无需进一步评估。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验