Caruso G, Nilsson J, Crisci C, Nolano M, Massini R, Lullo F
Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, School of Medicine, University Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1993 Dec;89(6):392-8. doi: 10.1016/0168-5597(93)90112-3.
We studied orthodromic sensory conduction velocity along the distal and proximal segments of the median and ulnar nerves by tactile stimulation of the distal phalanx of the 3rd and 5th digits in 44 healthy subjects divided into 2 age groups: from 16 to 35 years and from 63 to 81 years. In the same nerves, we used selective electrical stimulation of the corresponding digital nerves to obtain sensory potentials. In both groups, responses to tactile stimuli had a longer latency and smaller amplitude than those to electrical stimulation, and they were distributed in a series of 6-7 main deflections, apparently regardless of whether the recording site was distal or proximal. Moreover, irrespective of the nerve and of subject age, conduction velocity along both the digit-wrist and the wrist-elbow nerve segments was significantly slower with tactile stimuli than with electrical stimuli. However, independently of the stimulus used, conduction velocity along the proximal nerve segment was significantly faster than that measured along the digit-wrist nerve segment. In both the median and ulnar nerves, maximum potential amplitude, cumulative area and conduction velocity were significantly reduced in the older age group. This finding could reflect the smaller number of Meissner's corpuscles in older subjects, and the loss of large nerve fibres in individuals over 60.
我们通过对44名健康受试者(分为16至35岁和63至81岁两个年龄组)的第三和第五指远节指骨进行触觉刺激,研究了正中神经和尺神经远段和近段的顺向感觉传导速度。在相同的神经中,我们使用对相应指神经的选择性电刺激来获得感觉电位。在两组中,对触觉刺激的反应潜伏期更长,幅度更小,并且它们分布在一系列6至7个主要波峰中,显然与记录部位是远端还是近端无关。此外,无论神经和受试者年龄如何,与电刺激相比,触觉刺激时沿指-腕和腕-肘神经段的传导速度明显更慢。然而,与所使用的刺激无关,沿近端神经段的传导速度明显快于沿指-腕神经段测得的传导速度。在正中神经和尺神经中,老年组的最大电位幅度、累积面积和传导速度均显著降低。这一发现可能反映了老年受试者中迈斯纳小体数量较少,以及60岁以上个体中大神经纤维的丧失。