Suppr超能文献

MACOP-B方案与ProMACE-MOPP方案治疗晚期弥漫性非霍奇金淋巴瘤:非霍奇金淋巴瘤协作研究组前瞻性随机试验结果

MACOP-B versus ProMACE-MOPP in the treatment of advanced diffuse non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: results of a prospective randomized trial by the non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma Cooperative Study Group.

作者信息

Sertoli M R, Santini G, Chisesi T, Congiu A M, Rubagotti A, Contu A, Salvagno L, Coser P, Porcellini A, Vespignani M

机构信息

Institute of Oncology, Genova University, Italy.

出版信息

J Clin Oncol. 1994 Jul;12(7):1366-74. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1994.12.7.1366.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The aim of our study was to compare in a multicentric randomized trial two regimens widely used in the treatment of advanced-stage intermediate- to high-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma and to assess whether a third-generation regimen (methotrexate with leucovorin, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, prednisone, and bleomycin [MACOP-B]) was superior to a second-generation regimen (procarbazine, methotrexate with leucovorin, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, and etoposide [ProMACE-MOPP]).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between January 1987 and August 1991, 221 patients with diffuse intermediate- to high-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (Working Formulation groups F, G, H, and K), stage II bulky (> 10 cm), III, or IV, were randomized by the Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma Cooperative Study Group (NHLCSG) to receive ProMACE-MOPP for six cycles or MACOP-B for 12 weeks. Survival, progression-free survival, and disease-free survival were determined, and multivariate analysis of prognostic factors was performed.

RESULTS

In the two groups of patients, there was no significant difference in terms of complete remission (CR) rate (49.1% with ProMACE-MOPP and 52.3% with MACOP-B), 3-year overall survival rate (45.2% with PROMACE-MOPP and 52.3% with MACOP-B), and 3-year progression-free survival rate (36.4% with ProMACE-MOPP and 36.1% with MACOP-B). In terms of toxicity, no significantly greater toxicity occurred in either arm. Overall toxicity was acceptable. The most frequent side effects were grade II through IV leukopenia, infection, mucositis, and anemia. Treatment-related deaths were equally distributed.

CONCLUSION

No significant differences in terms of efficacy and/or toxicity between ProMACE-MOPP and MACOP-B are evident. These results are consistent with recent randomized trials showing that the new-generation aggressive regimens are no better than previous ones.

摘要

目的

我们研究的目的是在一项多中心随机试验中比较两种广泛用于治疗晚期中高级非霍奇金淋巴瘤的方案,并评估第三代方案(甲氨蝶呤加亚叶酸钙、多柔比星、环磷酰胺、长春新碱、泼尼松和博来霉素[MACOP - B])是否优于第二代方案(丙卡巴肼、甲氨蝶呤加亚叶酸钙、多柔比星、环磷酰胺和依托泊苷[ProMACE - MOPP])。

患者与方法

1987年1月至1991年8月期间,221例弥漫性中高级非霍奇金淋巴瘤(工作分类F、G、H和K组)、II期大包块(>10 cm)、III期或IV期患者,由非霍奇金淋巴瘤协作研究组(NHLCSG)随机分组,接受6个周期的ProMACE - MOPP或12周的MACOP - B治疗。测定生存率、无进展生存率和无病生存率,并对预后因素进行多变量分析。

结果

两组患者在完全缓解(CR)率(ProMACE - MOPP组为49.1%,MACOP - B组为52.3%)、3年总生存率(ProMACE - MOPP组为45.2%,MACOP - B组为52.3%)和3年无进展生存率(ProMACE - MOPP组为36.4%,MACOP - B组为36.1%)方面无显著差异。在毒性方面,两组均未出现明显更大的毒性。总体毒性是可接受的。最常见的副作用是II至IV级白细胞减少、感染、粘膜炎和贫血。与治疗相关的死亡分布均匀。

结论

ProMACE - MOPP和MACOP - B在疗效和/或毒性方面无显著差异。这些结果与最近的随机试验一致,表明新一代积极方案并不比以前的方案更好。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验