Suppr超能文献

载脂蛋白(a) kringle 4结构域数量对脂蛋白(a)免疫化学检测的影响。

Effect of the number of apolipoprotein(a) kringle 4 domains on immunochemical measurements of lipoprotein(a).

作者信息

Marcovina S M, Albers J J, Gabel B, Koschinsky M L, Gaur V P

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Northwest Lipid Research Laboratories, University of Washington, Seattle 98103.

出版信息

Clin Chem. 1995 Feb;41(2):246-55.

PMID:7533064
Abstract

Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] has been measured in numerous clinical and epidemiological studies by a variety of immunochemical methods. However, little, if any, consideration has been given to the confounding effect of the size heterogeneity of apolipoprotein(a) [apo(a)] on the measurement of Lp(a). We developed three direct-binding enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) with detecting antibodies of different specificities to evaluate the effect of apo(a) size on Lp(a) measurement. The three assays used the same monoclonal antibody to capture the apo(a)-containing particles and were calibrated (in nanomoles per liter) with a serum containing apo(a) with 21 kringle 4 domains. Using all three ELISAs, we measured Lp(a) in a group of 723 subjects selected to have a single apo(a) band, as determined by a high-resolution phenotyping system. Essentially identical results were obtained by the two methods that measured Lp(a) by use of either a polyclonal antibody against apo B or a monoclonal antibody against apo(a) that does not recognize the kringle 4 type 2 repeats. In contrast, the ELISA using a monoclonal antibody specific for apo(a) kringle 4 type 2 repeats overestimated Lp(a) concentration in samples containing apo(a) with more than 21 kringle 4 domains and underestimated Lp(a) samples containing apo(a) with fewer than 21 kringle 4 domains. Thus, these differences in Lp(a) values varied as a function of apo(a) size. We conclude that antibody specificity and apo(a) size heterogeneity can significantly affect Lp(a) measurements.

摘要

在众多临床和流行病学研究中,已通过多种免疫化学方法对脂蛋白(a)[Lp(a)]进行了测定。然而,对于载脂蛋白(a)[apo(a)]大小异质性对Lp(a)测定的混杂效应,即便有考虑,也微乎其微。我们开发了三种直接结合酶联免疫吸附测定法(ELISA),使用具有不同特异性的检测抗体来评估apo(a)大小对Lp(a)测定的影响。这三种测定法使用相同的单克隆抗体捕获含apo(a)的颗粒,并用含有21个kringle 4结构域的apo(a)血清进行校准(以纳摩尔/升为单位)。我们使用这三种ELISA方法,对一组723名经高分辨率表型分析系统测定为具有单一apo(a)条带的受试者的Lp(a)进行了测量。通过使用抗apo B多克隆抗体或不识别kringle 4 2型重复序列的抗apo(a)单克隆抗体来测量Lp(a)的两种方法,获得了基本相同的结果。相比之下,使用对apo(a) kringle 4 2型重复序列具有特异性的单克隆抗体的ELISA,高估了含有超过21个kringle 4结构域的apo(a)样本中的Lp(a)浓度,而低估了含有少于21个kringle 4结构域的apo(a)样本中的Lp(a)。因此,这些Lp(a)值的差异随apo(a)大小而变化。我们得出结论,抗体特异性和apo(a)大小异质性可显著影响Lp(a)的测量结果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验