Scharff L, Turk D C, Marcus D A
Pain Evaluation and Treatment Institute, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, USA.
Cephalalgia. 1995 Jun;15(3):216-23. doi: 10.1046/j.1468-2982.1995.015003216.x.
The present study attempted to identify psychological differences among different headache diagnoses defined by IHS criteria as well as psychological differences by headache intensity and frequency. Differences between diagnostic categories reflected characteristics used to assign diagnoses, namely the constancy of pain and distracting behaviors of significant others due to isolating behavior from photophobia and phonophobia. A rating of headache intensity and frequency was a more powerful predictor of psychological ratings than diagnosis. Diagnosis was related to headache frequency but not intensity. The results suggest that a continuum diagnosis based on severity can be useful in conceptualizing headaches, and a dual-diagnostic system integrating headache characteristics with perceptions and coping ability would be helpful in determining treatment options.
本研究试图确定由国际头痛协会(IHS)标准定义的不同头痛诊断之间的心理差异,以及头痛强度和频率方面的心理差异。诊断类别之间的差异反映了用于进行诊断的特征,即疼痛的持续性以及由于畏光和畏声导致的隔离行为而使重要他人产生的干扰行为。与诊断相比,头痛强度和频率的评分是心理评分更有力的预测指标。诊断与头痛频率相关,但与强度无关。结果表明,基于严重程度的连续诊断在头痛概念化方面可能有用,并且将头痛特征与认知和应对能力相结合的双重诊断系统将有助于确定治疗方案。