Suppr超能文献

对根据攻击潜伏期或筑巢行为选择的家鼠品系之间的比较:替代行为策略存在遗传基础的证据。

A comparison between house mouse lines selected for attack latency or nest-building: evidence for a genetic basis of alternative behavioral strategies.

作者信息

Sluyter F, Bult A, Lynch C B, van Oortmerssen G A, Koolhaas J M

机构信息

University of Groningen, Department of Animal Physiology, Haren, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Behav Genet. 1995 May;25(3):247-52. doi: 10.1007/BF02197183.

Abstract

House mouse lines bidirectionally selected for either nest-building behavior or attack latency were tested for both attack latency and nest-building behavior under identical conditions. Male mice selected for high nest-building behavior had shorter attack latencies, i.e., were more aggressive, than those selected for low nest-building behavior and their randomly bred control lines. Conversely, male wild house mice selected for short attack latency showed more nest-building behavior than those selected for long attack latency when tested at 110 days of age. These findings imply a common genetic basis for control of aggression and nesting and support earlier proposals as to how animals may exhibit fundamentally different responses to environmental challenges, either reacting actively to aversive situations (aggressive and high-nesting animals: active copers) or adopting a passive strategy (nonaggressive and low-nesting animals: passive copers).

摘要

对为筑巢行为或攻击潜伏期进行双向选择的家鼠品系,在相同条件下测试其攻击潜伏期和筑巢行为。被选择用于高筑巢行为的雄性小鼠比被选择用于低筑巢行为的小鼠及其随机繁殖的对照品系具有更短的攻击潜伏期,即更具攻击性。相反,在110日龄时进行测试时,被选择用于短攻击潜伏期的雄性野生家鼠比被选择用于长攻击潜伏期的家鼠表现出更多的筑巢行为。这些发现意味着控制攻击和筑巢存在共同的遗传基础,并支持了早期关于动物如何对环境挑战表现出根本不同反应的提议,即要么对厌恶情境做出积极反应(攻击性强和筑巢能力高的动物:积极应对者),要么采取被动策略(非攻击性和筑巢能力低的动物:被动应对者)。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验