Suppr超能文献

再次插管会增加需要机械通气的患者发生医院获得性肺炎的风险。

Re-intubation increases the risk of nosocomial pneumonia in patients needing mechanical ventilation.

作者信息

Torres A, Gatell J M, Aznar E, el-Ebiary M, Puig de la Bellacasa J, González J, Ferrer M, Rodriguez-Roisin R

机构信息

Hospital Clínic, Departament de Medicina, Universitat de Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1995 Jul;152(1):137-41. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.152.1.7599812.

Abstract

In order to confirm that re-intubation can be a risk factor of nosocomial pneumonia in mechanically ventilated patients, a case-control study was performed. Forty consecutive patients needing re-intubation were selected as cases. Each case was paired with a matched control for the previous duration of mechanical ventilation (+/- 2 d). Nineteen (47%) of the cases developed pneumonia after re-intubation compared with 4 (10%) of the controls (odds ratio [OR] = 8.5; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.7 to 105.9; p = 0.0007). After adjusting for age, sex, and presence of prior bronchoscopy, the conditional logistic regression analysis demonstrated that re-intubation was the only significant factor related to the development of pneumonia (OR: 5.94; 95% CI 1.27 to 22.71; p = 0.023). Sixteen (73%) of the 22 patients lying semirecumbent during the interval between extubation and re-intubation developed nosocomial pneumonia versus three (16%) of the 18 in supine position (p = 0.001). These results indicate that semirecumbency during the period between extubation and re-intubation may play a role in nosocomial pneumonia development in patients who need re-intubation. Total intensive care unit stay (19.4 +/- 10 versus 13.9 +/- 11.9 days, p = 0.0008) and crude mortality (35 versus 20%, p = 0.14) were also higher in re-intubated patients when compared with controls. We conclude that re-intubation is a risk factor for ventilator-associated pneumonia and might be avoided in a substantial number of cases.

摘要

为了证实再次插管可能是机械通气患者医院获得性肺炎的一个危险因素,进行了一项病例对照研究。连续选择40例需要再次插管的患者作为病例组。每个病例与一个在先前机械通气时间(±2天)上匹配的对照组配对。19例(47%)病例在再次插管后发生肺炎,而对照组为4例(10%)(优势比[OR]=8.5;95%置信区间[CI]1.7至105.9;p=0.0007)。在对年龄、性别和既往支气管镜检查情况进行校正后,条件逻辑回归分析表明再次插管是与肺炎发生相关的唯一显著因素(OR:5.94;95%CI 1.27至22.71;p=0.023)。在拔管至再次插管期间处于半卧位的22例患者中有16例(73%)发生了医院获得性肺炎,而仰卧位的18例患者中有3例(16%)发生(p=0.001)。这些结果表明,在拔管至再次插管期间半卧位可能在需要再次插管的患者医院获得性肺炎的发生中起作用。与对照组相比,再次插管患者的重症监护病房总住院时间(19.4±10天对13.9±11.9天,p=0.0008)和粗死亡率(35%对20%,p=0.14)也更高。我们得出结论,再次插管是呼吸机相关性肺炎的一个危险因素,在相当多的病例中可能是可以避免的。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验