Suppr超能文献

用于创伤复苏的经皮中心静脉通路

Percutaneous central venous access for resuscitation in trauma.

作者信息

Scalea T M, Sinert R, Duncan A O, Rice P, Austin R, Kohl L, Trooskin S Z, Talbert S

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine and Surgery, SUNY Health Science Center at Brooklyn, USA.

出版信息

Acad Emerg Med. 1994 Nov-Dec;1(6):525-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.1994.tb02547.x.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine the safety of percutaneous central venous access when used for trauma resuscitation and whether the initial hemodynamic status of the patient or the site of placement affects the ease or success of line placement.

METHOD

Consecutive major-trauma patients were managed using a resuscitation protocol guiding intravenous line use. Percutaneous peripheral venous access was initially attempted in all patients. If this approach was unsuccessful or proved to be inadequate for volume resuscitation, venous access was attempted using central venous catheter-introducer sets. The site of the central venous access was determined by protocol. For thoracic injury, access was via the ipsilateral subclavian vein (SCV), the ipsilateral internal jugular vein (IJV), or the femoral vein. For suspected mediastinal injury, access was via the contralateral SCV or IJV, or the femoral vein. For abdominal or flank injury, access was via the SCV or IJV only. Multiple central venous access sites were used at the discretion of the trauma team.

RESULTS

Central venous access was successful at 144 of 147 sites (99%) used in 122 patients during the study period. There was only one major complication (rate = 0.7%; 95% CI 0.0-3.8%). Mean catheter placement time was 1.9 minutes, and cannulation occurred with a mean of 1.8 needle passes. Most patients (81/122) were hypotensive (blood pressure < or = 90 torr) at the time of line placement, including 44 who were in cardiac arrest and four awake patients who had no obtainable blood pressure. Neither the access site nor the presence of hypotension was associated with the mean time to obtain central venous access, the mean number of attempts, or the complication rate.

CONCLUSION

Percutaneous central venous access is relatively safe and reliable for gaining intravenous access when resuscitating trauma patients, when used in a center where physicians are experienced in the technique. Consideration should be given to expanding the use of central venous access in trauma resuscitation.

摘要

目的

确定经皮中心静脉置管用于创伤复苏时的安全性,以及患者的初始血流动力学状态或置管部位是否会影响置管的难易程度或成功率。

方法

对连续的严重创伤患者采用指导静脉置管使用的复苏方案进行管理。所有患者首先尝试经皮外周静脉置管。如果这种方法不成功或被证明不足以进行容量复苏,则尝试使用中心静脉导管导入套件进行静脉置管。中心静脉置管的部位根据方案确定。对于胸部损伤,通过同侧锁骨下静脉(SCV)、同侧颈内静脉(IJV)或股静脉进行置管。对于疑似纵隔损伤,通过对侧SCV或IJV或股静脉进行置管。对于腹部或侧腹损伤,仅通过SCV或IJV进行置管。创伤团队可酌情使用多个中心静脉置管部位。

结果

在研究期间,122例患者使用的147个置管部位中有144个成功进行了中心静脉置管(99%)。仅发生1例严重并发症(发生率 = 0.7%;95% CI 0.0 - 3.8%)。平均导管置入时间为1.9分钟,平均穿刺1.8次成功置管。大多数患者(81/122)在置管时血压偏低(血压≤90托),其中包括44例心脏骤停患者和4例清醒但无法测得血压的患者。置管部位和低血压状态均与获得中心静脉置管的平均时间、平均尝试次数或并发症发生率无关。

结论

在有经验的医生操作的中心,经皮中心静脉置管在创伤患者复苏时用于获得静脉通路相对安全可靠。应考虑在创伤复苏中扩大中心静脉置管的使用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验