Kaye D H
College of Law, Arizona State University, Tempe 85287-7906, USA.
Genetica. 1995;96(1-2):99-105. doi: 10.1007/BF01441155.
This paper reviews judicial opinions that have discussed the April 1992 recommendations of a committee of the U.S. National Research Council concerning the statistics of forensic DNA profiles obtained with single-locus VNTR probes. It observes that a few courts have held 'ceiling frequencies' (as opposed to less 'conservative' estimates) admissible, but that the implications of the scientific criticisms of the ceiling procedures have yet to be addressed adequately in court opinions. It urges courts to distinguish between policy judgments and scientific assessments in both the NRC report and the scientific literature, and to defer less to the former than to the latter.
本文回顾了一些司法意见,这些意见讨论了美国国家研究委员会一个委员会于1992年4月提出的关于用单基因座VNTR探针获得的法医DNA图谱统计数据的建议。文章指出,一些法院已认定“上限频率”(与不那么“保守”的估计相对)可被采纳,但法院意见中尚未充分探讨对上限程序的科学批评所带来的影响。文章敦促法院在国家研究委员会的报告和科学文献中区分政策判断和科学评估,并在两者中更尊重后者而非前者。