Chung J W, Park J H, Han J K, Choi B I, Han M C
Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Korea.
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1995 Aug;165(2):315-21. doi: 10.2214/ajr.165.2.7618547.
Our objective was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of transcatheter oily chemoembolization therapy in a series of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and portal vein invasion.
We retrospectively analyzed the results of transcatheter oily chemoembolization for 110 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma invading major portal branches. The Child's classes were A for 94 patients and B for 16. The main portal vein was partially (n = 33) or completely (n = 15) invaded in 48 patients, the right portal vein was invaded in 36, and the left portal vein was invaded in 26. Oily chemoembolization was performed with an emulsion of iodized oil and doxorubicin hydrochloride. Gelatin sponge particle embolization was added for 78 patients. Seventy-one patients underwent multiple treatment sessions.
Our initial findings showed that 31 patients had complete or partial remission, with an overall median survival time of 6 months. The cumulative survival rates were 48% (6 months), 30% (1 year), 18% (2 years), and 9% (3 years). The parenchymal tumor extent was the most significant predicting factor for complications and efficacy of therapy. Of 33 patients with a parenchymal tumor limited to one or two segments of a hepatic lobe, 22 had complete or partial remission, with a median survival time of 22 months; this survival time was significantly longer than that (5 months) for 77 patients with a more extensive tumor (p < .0001). Hepatic insufficiency developed in 10 patients, and three of them died within 1 month after chemoembolization. All 10 patients had an extensive parenchymal tumor involving more than two hepatic segments, and four had impaired hepatic functional reserve of Child's class B.
When a tumor is limited in extent and hepatic function is preserved, transcatheter oily chemoembolization is effective and safe for the palliation of hepatocellular carcinoma and major portal vein invasion. However, when a parenchymal tumor is extensive, chemoembolization is associated with a poor response and a risk of hepatic failure.
我们的目的是评估经导管油化疗栓塞治疗一系列肝细胞癌合并门静脉侵犯患者的疗效和安全性。
我们回顾性分析了110例肝细胞癌侵犯主要门静脉分支患者的经导管油化疗栓塞结果。Child分级为A的患者有94例,B级的有16例。48例患者的主要门静脉部分(n = 33)或完全(n = 15)受侵犯,36例右门静脉受侵犯,26例左门静脉受侵犯。采用碘化油与盐酸多柔比星的乳剂进行油化疗栓塞。78例患者加用了明胶海绵颗粒栓塞。71例患者接受了多次治疗。
我们的初步研究结果显示,31例患者获得完全或部分缓解,总体中位生存时间为6个月。累积生存率分别为48%(6个月)、30%(1年)、18%(2年)和9%(3年)。实质肿瘤范围是治疗并发症和疗效的最显著预测因素。在33例实质肿瘤局限于肝叶一个或两个节段的患者中,22例获得完全或部分缓解,中位生存时间为22个月;这一生存时间显著长于77例肿瘤范围更广患者的生存时间(5个月)(p <.0001)。10例患者发生肝功能不全,其中3例在化疗栓塞后1个月内死亡。所有10例患者的实质肿瘤范围广泛,累及两个以上肝段,4例患者的Child B级肝功能储备受损。
当肿瘤范围局限且肝功能良好时,经导管油化疗栓塞对于缓解肝细胞癌合并主要门静脉侵犯是有效且安全的。然而,当实质肿瘤范围广泛时,化疗栓塞的反应较差且有肝衰竭风险。