Verhulst J, Tucker G
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle 98105, USA.
Psychiatr Serv. 1995 May;46(5):513-4. doi: 10.1176/ps.46.5.513.
Using a case example, the authors contrast two different approaches to psychiatric assessment: the medical approach, in which the physician examines signs and symptoms and compares them with diagnostic criteria for various disorders, and the narrative approach, in which the clinician tries to understand symptoms as a part of a meaningful story and as understandable responses to external conditions. Both approaches make essential contributions to psychiatry. The current conflict between biological psychiatry and psychotherapeutic psychiatry can be seen as a result of reductionist polarization involving these opposite approaches. The reconciliation of these opposites may be vital for the survival of general psychiatry as a medical specialty.
作者通过一个案例,对比了两种不同的精神病学评估方法:医学方法,即医生检查体征和症状,并将其与各种疾病的诊断标准进行比较;以及叙事方法,即临床医生试图将症状理解为一个有意义故事的一部分,以及对外部状况的可理解反应。这两种方法都对精神病学做出了重要贡献。当前生物精神病学和心理治疗精神病学之间的冲突,可以看作是涉及这两种相反方法的还原论两极分化的结果。调和这些对立面对于普通精神病学作为一门医学专业的生存可能至关重要。