Mitta D A, Packebush S J
Georgia Tech Research Institute, ELSYS/CAD, Atlanta 30332-0840, USA.
Ergonomics. 1995 Jul;38(7):1307-25. doi: 10.1080/00140139508925190.
User learning is of critical importance in evaluating interface usability (and in turn interface quality). The focus of this research in on interface learnability, where a stochastic model represents the learning process required for successful completion of human-computer interaction tasks. The parameter used to quantify learning is a learning rate. Of interest here is the validation of learning rate as a measure of interface quality. Learning rate was validated against two traditional measures of interface quality: task completion time, and error frequency. SuperCard, a Macintosh project utility, provided an empirical learning environment in which 32 participants learned 16 fundamental SuperCard tasks. Results of correlation analyses suggested the usefulness of learning rate as an indicator of interface quality. Our learning rate analysis identified four tasks presenting learning difficulties. (Analysis of task completion times identified two of these four tasks, and error frequency analysis identified one). Learning rate data captured all of the information available from the two traditional interface quality measures and identified two tasks disregarded by them. Incorporating learning rates in the interface evaluation process precludes time-intensive video tape analysis typically required by more traditional interface quality measures.
用户学习对于评估界面可用性(进而评估界面质量)至关重要。本研究的重点是界面可学习性,其中一个随机模型代表成功完成人机交互任务所需的学习过程。用于量化学习的参数是学习率。这里感兴趣的是验证学习率作为界面质量度量的有效性。针对两项传统的界面质量度量标准对学习率进行了验证:任务完成时间和错误频率。“超级卡片”(SuperCard),一款麦金塔项目实用程序,提供了一个实证学习环境,32名参与者在其中学习了16项基本的超级卡片任务。相关分析结果表明学习率作为界面质量指标是有用的。我们的学习率分析确定了四项存在学习困难的任务。(任务完成时间分析确定了这四项任务中的两项,错误频率分析确定了其中一项)。学习率数据捕捉了来自两项传统界面质量度量标准的所有可用信息,并确定了两项被它们忽略的任务。在界面评估过程中纳入学习率可以避免通常更传统的界面质量度量标准所要求的耗时的录像带分析。