相似文献
1
Improving the quality of cancer registration data.提高癌症登记数据的质量。
J R Soc Med. 1995 May;88(5):268-71.
2
Reliability of cancer registration data.癌症登记数据的可靠性。
Eur J Cancer. 1997 May;33(6):812-4. doi: 10.1016/s0959-8049(97)00082-8.
3
4
Comparability and Quality Control in Cancer Registration; Karachi (data monitoring 1995-2001).癌症登记中的可比性与质量控制；卡拉奇（1995 - 2001年数据监测）
J Pak Med Assoc. 2002 Jul;52(7):301-7.
5
Cancer Registration in Basrah-Southern Iraq: Validation by Household Survey.伊拉克南部巴士拉的癌症登记：通过家庭调查进行验证
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2016;17(S3):197-200.
6
Reliability of cancer registration data in Scotland, 1997.1997年苏格兰癌症登记数据的可靠性
Eur J Cancer. 2002 Feb;38(3):414-7. doi: 10.1016/s0959-8049(01)00385-9.
7
Data quality at population-based cancer registries in Colombia.哥伦比亚基于人群的癌症登记处的数据质量。
Biomedica. 2012 Oct-Dec;32(4):536-44. doi: 10.1590/S0120-41572012000400009.
8
Quality of cancer registry data: a comparison of data provided by clinicians with those of registration personnel.癌症登记数据的质量：临床医生提供的数据与登记人员提供的数据之比较。
Br J Cancer. 1993 Nov;68(5):974-7. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1993.464.
9
Cancer Registration in India - Current Scenario and Future Perspectives.印度的癌症登记——现状与未来展望
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2016;17(8):3687-96.
10
Cancer registration in the Peoples Republic of China.中华人民共和国的癌症登记
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2012;13(8):4209-14. doi: 10.7314/apjcp.2012.13.8.4209.
引用本文的文献
1
Completeness of Cancer Case Ascertainment in International Cancer Registries: Exploring the Issue of Gender Disparities.国际癌症登记处癌症病例确诊的完整性：探讨性别差异问题。
Front Oncol. 2020 Jul 16;10:1148. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.01148. eCollection 2020.
2
Are online prediction tools a valid alternative to genomic profiling in the context of systemic treatment of ER-positive breast cancer?在雌激素受体阳性乳腺癌的系统治疗背景下，在线预测工具能否有效替代基因谱分析？
Cell Mol Biol Lett. 2017 Sep 4;22:20. doi: 10.1186/s11658-017-0049-x. eCollection 2017.
3
[Types of medical registries - definitions, methodological aspects and quality of the scientific work with registries].[医学登记册的类型——定义、方法学方面以及登记册科学工作的质量]
Wien Med Wochenschr. 2011 Dec;161(23-24):580-90. doi: 10.1007/s10354-011-0040-5.
4
Benefits and limitations of pathology databases to cancer registries.病理数据库对癌症登记处的益处与局限性。
J Clin Pathol. 1996 Nov;49(11):947-9. doi: 10.1136/jcp.49.11.947.
本文引用的文献
1
Coding of clinical diagnoses. Clerical and medical errors contribute to inaccuracy.临床诊断编码。文书工作和医疗失误会导致不准确。
BMJ. 1993 Jun 5;306(6891):1541. doi: 10.1136/bmj.306.6891.1541-a.
2
Completeness of cancer registration in Limburg, The Netherlands.荷兰林堡省癌症登记的完整性。
Int J Epidemiol. 1993 Jun;22(3):369-76. doi: 10.1093/ije/22.3.369.
3
Cancer registration: its uses in research, and confidentiality in the EC.癌症登记：其在研究中的用途以及欧盟的保密性。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 1993 Oct;47(5):342-4. doi: 10.1136/jech.47.5.342.
4
Quality of cancer registry data: a comparison of data provided by clinicians with those of registration personnel.癌症登记数据的质量：临床医生提供的数据与登记人员提供的数据之比较。
Br J Cancer. 1993 Nov;68(5):974-7. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1993.464.
5
How accurate are Scottish cancer registration data?苏格兰癌症登记数据的准确性如何？
Br J Cancer. 1994 Nov;70(5):954-9. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1994.428.
6
Registry evaluation methods: a review and case study.注册评估方法：综述与案例研究
Epidemiol Rev. 1980;2:210-20. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.epirev.a036224.
7
Accuracy of basic cancer patient data: results from an extensive recoding survey.癌症患者基础数据的准确性：一项广泛重新编码调查的结果
J Natl Cancer Inst. 1984 May;72(5):1007-14.
8
Registers and registries: a review.登记册与注册库：综述
Int J Epidemiol. 1973 Autumn;2(3):221-8. doi: 10.1093/ije/2.3.221.
9
The cancer registry in cancer control: an overview.癌症控制中的癌症登记：概述
IARC Sci Publ. 1985(66):13-26.
10
Cancer registration: historical aspects.癌症登记：历史方面
IARC Sci Publ. 1985(66):3-12.
Zotero 插件