Middelkoop H A, Knuistingh Neven A, van Hilten J J, Ruwhof C W, Kamphuisen H A
Department of Neurology, Leiden University Hospital, The Netherlands.
Thorax. 1995 Mar;50(3):284-9. doi: 10.1136/thx.50.3.284.
The combined use of wrist actigraphic assessment and self assessment of sleep in the screening of obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome was evaluated in a community based sample.
One hundred and sixteen community based subjects clinically suspected of having obstructive sleep apnoea (syndrome) were evaluated by means of simultaneous ambulatory recording of respiration (oronasal flow thermistry), motor activity (wrist actigraphy), and subjective sleep (sleep log) during one night of sleep.
The subjects were distributed according to their apnoea index (AI); AI < 1 (non-apnoeic snorers) 44%; AI 1- < 5 39%; and AI > or = 5 17%. High apnoea index values were associated with self reported disturbed sleep initiation and more fragmented and increased levels of motor activity and decreased duration of immobility periods, particularly in those with an apnoea index of > or = 5. Across subjects the duration of immobility periods was the only predictor of the apnoea index, explaining 11% of its variance. Use of the multiple regression equation to discriminate retrospectively between those with an apnoea index of < 1 and > or = 5 resulted in sensitivity and specificity values of 75% and 43%, and 5% and 100%, respectively.
The combined use of a sleep log and actigraphic assessment of sleep failed to identify reliably those subjects who suffered from obstructive sleep apnoea (syndrome) in a sample of community based subjects reporting habitual snoring combined with excessive daytime sleepiness and/or nocturnal respiratory arrests.
在一个基于社区的样本中,评估了腕部活动记录仪评估与睡眠自我评估联合用于阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停综合征筛查的情况。
对116名临床上怀疑患有阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(综合征)的社区受试者,在一晚睡眠期间通过同时进行呼吸(口鼻气流热传感)、运动活动(腕部活动记录仪)和主观睡眠(睡眠日志)的动态记录来进行评估。
受试者根据其呼吸暂停指数(AI)进行分布;AI<1(非呼吸暂停性打鼾者)占44%;AI 1-<5占39%;AI≥5占17%。高呼吸暂停指数值与自我报告的睡眠起始障碍、更碎片化以及运动活动水平增加和静止期持续时间减少有关,尤其是在呼吸暂停指数≥5的受试者中。在所有受试者中,静止期持续时间是呼吸暂停指数的唯一预测因素,解释了其11%的方差。使用多元回归方程对呼吸暂停指数<1和≥5的受试者进行回顾性区分,敏感性和特异性值分别为75%和43%,以及5%和100%。
在一个报告习惯性打鼾并伴有白天过度嗜睡和/或夜间呼吸暂停的社区受试者样本中,睡眠日志与睡眠活动记录仪评估联合使用未能可靠地识别出患有阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(综合征)的受试者。