Jones J S, Hoerle D, Riekse R
Department of Emergency Medicine, Butterworth Hospital, Michigan State University College of Human Medicine, Grand Rapids, USA.
Ann Emerg Med. 1995 Sep;26(3):296-9. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(95)70075-7.
To survey emergency care providers about their stethoscope-cleaning measures and to determine the correlation between these measures and the extent of Staphylococcus carriage.
Prospective cross-sectional analysis.
University-affiliated community hospital ED.
One hundred fifty health care providers, comprising emergency medicine house staff and attending physicians (n = 50), ED nurses (n = 50), and prehospital personnel working in Kent County, Michigan (n = 50).
Providers were asked how often they cleaned their stethoscopes and which cleaning agents were used. We then cultured each stethoscope by pressing the diaphragm on mannitol agar and incubating the culture aerobically for 48 hours. Staphylococcus aureus was identified by means of standard measures. We examined the effects of different cleaning agents on 24 stethoscopes. The numbers of colony-forming units (CFUs) before and after cleaning with alcohol, nonionic detergent, and antiseptic soap were noted.
Overall, 48% of health care providers (74 of 150) cleaned their stethoscopes daily or weekly, 37% monthly, and 7% yearly; and 7% had never cleaned their stethoscopes. No significant differences were found in the hygiene routines of the three groups of providers surveyed. Use of an alcohol swab was the preferred method of cleaning. One hundred thirty-three stethoscopes (89%) grew staphylococci; 25 (19%) yielded S aureus. Mean staphylococcal bacterial counts ( +/- SD) were 52 +/- 78 CFUs per stethoscope among physicians, 46 +/- 92 CFUs among emergency medical service personnel, and 13 +/- 21 CFUs from the nursing staff (ANOVA, P = .01). Cleaning the stethoscope diaphragm resulted in immediate reduction in the bacterial count: by 94% with alcohol swabs, 90% with nonionic detergent, and 75% with antiseptic soap.
Our results confirm that stethoscopes used in emergency practice are often contaminated with staphylococci and are therefore a potential vector of infection. This contamination is greatly reduced by frequent cleaning with alcohol or nonionic detergent.
调查急救护理人员的听诊器清洁措施,并确定这些措施与葡萄球菌携带程度之间的相关性。
前瞻性横断面分析。
大学附属医院的急诊科。
150名医护人员,包括急诊医学住院医师和主治医师(n = 50)、急诊科护士(n = 50)以及密歇根州肯特县的院前急救人员(n = 50)。
询问医护人员听诊器的清洁频率以及使用的清洁剂。然后通过将听诊器膜片按压在甘露醇琼脂上并进行48小时需氧培养来培养每个听诊器。采用标准方法鉴定金黄色葡萄球菌。我们检查了不同清洁剂对24个听诊器的影响。记录用酒精、非离子洗涤剂和抗菌皂清洁前后的菌落形成单位(CFU)数量。
总体而言,48%的医护人员(150人中的74人)每天或每周清洁听诊器,37%每月清洁一次,7%每年清洁一次;7%的人从未清洁过听诊器。在接受调查的三组医护人员的卫生习惯方面未发现显著差异。使用酒精棉签是首选的清洁方法。133个听诊器(89%)培养出葡萄球菌;25个(19%)培养出金黄色葡萄球菌。医生组每个听诊器的平均葡萄球菌细菌计数(±标准差)为52±78 CFU,急救医疗服务人员组为46±92 CFU,护理人员组为13±21 CFU(方差分析,P = 0.01)。清洁听诊器膜片可立即降低细菌计数:酒精棉签降低94%,非离子洗涤剂降低90%,抗菌皂降低75%。
我们的结果证实,急诊实践中使用的听诊器经常被葡萄球菌污染,因此是潜在的感染传播媒介。通过经常用酒精或非离子洗涤剂清洁,这种污染可大大减少。