Müller N, Kretschmer V, Neumann H J, Weisswange T
Institut für Transfusionsmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Essen, BRD.
Beitr Infusionsther. 1993;31:92-9.
Only multicenter studies on cell separators give valid data to compare different cell separators. The aim of the 2nd multicenter study was to evaluate the separation protocol, software version V 4.61, of the Fresenius AS-104 cell separator for efficiency and deviation from predicted yields. Plateletpheresis data from twelve hemapheresis centers, using identical apheresis protocols and cell counting methods, were registered and statistically analyzed. Additionally, the counting methods of the centers were controlled by a ring study with biweekly external cell count trials. To get a comparison, the apheresis data, which depend on the center effects, were corrected by the values from the ring study. Preliminary results of 380 runs are 45.2 +/- 8.1% for the separation effectivity, 1.95% deviation from the predicted yield, whereby 90% of all runs deviated less than 20% from the predicted yield. 50% of products had a WBC contamination below 6 x 10(6).
只有关于细胞分离机的多中心研究才能提供有效的数据来比较不同的细胞分离机。第二项多中心研究的目的是评估费森尤斯AS - 104细胞分离机的分离方案(软件版本V 4.61)的效率以及与预测产量的偏差。来自十二个血液成分单采中心的血小板单采数据,采用相同的单采方案和细胞计数方法进行记录并统计分析。此外,各中心的计数方法通过一项双周外部细胞计数试验的环形研究进行控制。为了进行比较,依赖于中心效应的单采数据通过环形研究的值进行了校正。380次运行的初步结果显示,分离效率为45.2±8.1%,与预测产量的偏差为1.95%,其中所有运行的90%与预测产量的偏差小于20%。50%的产品白细胞污染低于6×10⁶。