Wadeson H, Carpenter W T
J Nerv Ment Dis. 1976 May;162(5):334-44. doi: 10.1097/00005053-197605000-00004.
The literature on art productions from psychiatric patients consistently suggests that specific graphic characteristics distinguish among various major diagnostic groups. These hypothesized differences are summarized. Systematic collection of art productions as part of separate research programs studying affective psychoses and schizophrenia has enabled us to amass a collection of psychotic patients' drawings which are used in an attempt to evaluate these hypotheses empirically. Art sessions were held with 104 patients hospitalized for affective psychoses and with 62 patients hospitalized for acute schizophrenia at NIH's Clinical Center. Comparing these drawings across diagnostic groups revealed, to our surprise and contrary to extant hypotheses, considerable within-diagnostic group variability and between-group overlap. There were, nonetheless, some trends in the hypothesized directions. These differences, however, disappeared when comparisons were made on a subsample of age-matched patients. This discrepancy between this research and expectations based on the literature is discussed. Our studies indicate that pictorial characteristics are not closely associated with diagnosis. We have, however, found that individual patient's art productions, and their associations to the pictures, are of great value in arriving at a dynamic understanding of the patient, regardless of diagnosis.
关于精神病患者艺术作品的文献一直表明,特定的图形特征可区分不同的主要诊断类别。这些假设的差异进行了总结。作为研究情感性精神病和精神分裂症的独立研究项目的一部分,系统收集艺术作品使我们积累了一批精神病患者的画作,用于尝试从实证角度评估这些假设。在美国国立卫生研究院临床中心,对104名因情感性精神病住院的患者和62名因急性精神分裂症住院的患者进行了艺术创作活动。跨诊断组比较这些画作时,令我们惊讶的是,与现有假设相反,诊断组内存在相当大的变异性,且组间存在重叠。尽管如此,仍有一些符合假设方向的趋势。然而,在对年龄匹配的患者子样本进行比较时,这些差异消失了。讨论了本研究与基于文献的预期之间的这种差异。我们的研究表明,绘画特征与诊断并无紧密关联。然而,我们发现,无论诊断如何,单个患者的艺术作品及其与画作的关联对于深入了解患者具有重要价值。