Suppr超能文献

主动脉造影和经食管超声心动图对主动脉夹层假阴性诊断的频率及原因

Frequency and explanation of false negative diagnosis of aortic dissection by aortography and transesophageal echocardiography.

作者信息

Bansal R C, Chandrasekaran K, Ayala K, Smith D C

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Loma Linda University, California, USA.

出版信息

J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995 May;25(6):1393-401. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(94)00569-C.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This study was designed to define the frequency and explanation of false negative diagnosis of aortic dissection by aortography and transesophageal echocardiography.

BACKGROUND

Aortography and transesophageal echocardiography have been widely utilized to diagnose aortic dissection. Previous reports have not fully addressed the reasons why these studies yield false negative results in a large number of patients with aortic dissection.

METHODS

Sixty-five consecutive patients with aortic dissection underwent aortography and transesophageal echocardiography. Diagnosis of aortic dissection was confirmed at operation or by computed tomography in all patients.

RESULTS

Biplane transesophageal echocardiograms yielded false negative results in two patients (sensitivity 97% [63 of 65]). Both patients had well localized DeBakey type II aortic dissection. The diagnosis was probably missed because of image interference from the air-filled trachea and mainstem bronchi. In both patients, the dissection was readily identified by aortography. Aortograms yielded false negative results in 15 patients (sensitivity 77% [50 of 65]); the aortic dissection was type I in 7 patients, type II in 1 and type III in 7. The dissection in all 15 patients was readily identified by transesophageal echocardiography. The missed diagnosis was probably due to a completely thrombosed false lumen or intramural hematoma with noncommunicating dissection in 13 patients and to a large ascending aortic aneurysm with nearly equal flow on both sides of the intimal flap in 2. In no patient was the diagnosis missed by both aortography and transesophageal echocardiography.

CONCLUSION

Transesophageal echocardiography is an excellent screening tool for aortic dissection. However, it may miss small type II aortic dissections localized to the upper portion of the ascending aorta because of image interference from the air-filled trachea. An intramural hematoma cannot be easily visualized by aortography, and this lesion is the principal reason for false negative aortographic findings.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在确定主动脉造影和经食管超声心动图对主动脉夹层假阴性诊断的频率及原因。

背景

主动脉造影和经食管超声心动图已被广泛用于诊断主动脉夹层。既往报告尚未充分探讨这些检查在大量主动脉夹层患者中产生假阴性结果的原因。

方法

连续65例主动脉夹层患者接受了主动脉造影和经食管超声心动图检查。所有患者均通过手术或计算机断层扫描确诊为主动脉夹层。

结果

双平面经食管超声心动图在2例患者中出现假阴性结果(敏感性97%[65例中的63例])。这2例患者均为局限性DeBakey II型主动脉夹层。诊断可能因充气的气管和主支气管的图像干扰而遗漏。在这2例患者中,主动脉造影均能轻松识别夹层。主动脉造影在15例患者中出现假阴性结果(敏感性77%[65例中的50例]);其中7例为I型主动脉夹层,1例为II型,7例为III型。经食管超声心动图能轻松识别所有15例患者的夹层。漏诊可能是由于13例患者的假腔完全血栓形成或壁内血肿伴非交通性夹层,以及2例患者的升主动脉瘤较大且内膜瓣两侧血流几乎相等。没有患者同时被主动脉造影和经食管超声心动图漏诊。

结论

经食管超声心动图是主动脉夹层的优秀筛查工具。然而,由于充气气管的图像干扰,它可能会遗漏局限于升主动脉上部的小型II型主动脉夹层。壁内血肿不易通过主动脉造影显示,这是主动脉造影假阴性结果的主要原因。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验