Karnell M P
Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Iowa, Iowa City, USA.
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1995 Mar;32(2):145-8. doi: 10.1597/1545-1569_1995_032_0145_ndohat_2.3.co_2.
Agreement between nasalance measures and perception of nasality during speech is not consistently strong. A possible reason may be the complicating combined effects of nasal turbulent airflow and nasal resonance. The purpose of this preliminary study was to examine nasalance measures obtained during production of a low pressure speech sample designed to minimize or eliminate the effects of turbulent nasal airflow. The results showed that nasalance measures obtained as some of the subjects produced the new speech sample were significantly different from those obtained when the standard high pressure speech sample was used. Use of both the new low pressure samples and the standard high pressure samples may result in improved agreement between nasalance measures and ratings of speech nasality as well as assist in the identification of subgroups of patients with marginal velopharyngeal insufficiency.
鼻流量测量与言语时鼻音感知之间的一致性并不总是很强。一个可能的原因可能是鼻湍流气流和鼻腔共鸣的复杂综合作用。这项初步研究的目的是检查在生成一个旨在最小化或消除湍流鼻气流影响的低压言语样本过程中获得的鼻流量测量结果。结果表明,一些受试者生成新言语样本时获得的鼻流量测量结果与使用标准高压言语样本时获得的结果有显著差异。同时使用新的低压样本和标准高压样本可能会提高鼻流量测量与言语鼻音评级之间的一致性,并有助于识别边缘性腭咽闭合不全患者的亚组。