Suppr超能文献

学术医学和补充医学在推理和评估方面相互不同,但在目标上并无差异。

[Academic medicine and complementary medicine differ from each other in reasoning and evaluation but not in goals].

作者信息

Baumann P H

机构信息

FIAM, Inselpital, Bern.

出版信息

Praxis (Bern 1994). 1994 Dec 20;83(51-52):1432-8.

PMID:7809558
Abstract

The principal objective of all medical activity is to prevent deterioration of health, but also its recuperation, when it has been lost, by mobilisation of inner, natural resources and the commitment of practical knowledge about ill-health. This is less true not for individuals with regard to their proper care, than for practitioners of the arts and sciences of healing towards those who seek their help, regardless of the 'school' to which they may belong. If such objectives are generally accepted, the way to their accomplishment is open. However relevant and justifiable differing intentions may be, they become difficult to materialize if energy is squandered in futile disputes over territorial rights. It is the purpose of the Swiss National Science Foundation's 'Komplementärmedizin' Programme (NFP 34) to build bridges between different territories. (See the Table of Projects currently being undertaken at the end of this article.)

摘要

所有医疗活动的主要目标是预防健康状况恶化,同时在健康丧失时,通过调动内在的自然资源以及运用有关疾病的实用知识来促进康复。对于寻求帮助的人而言,相较于个人自身的恰当护理,这一点在治疗艺术和科学的从业者身上体现得更为明显,无论这些从业者隶属于何种“流派”。如果这些目标得到普遍认可,那么实现这些目标的途径便畅通无阻。然而,无论不同意图多么合理且正当,倘若在徒劳的地盘之争中浪费精力,它们就难以实现。瑞士国家科学基金会的“补充医学”项目(NFP 34)旨在搭建不同领域之间的桥梁。(见本文末尾正在开展的项目表。)

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验