Harrington J M
Institute of Occupational Health, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, United Kingdom.
Ann Acad Med Singap. 1994 Sep;23(5):699-705.
Working outside normal hours either by extended days or shift work is a fact of industrial society. Its economic advantages must be weighed against detrimental effects on the individual worker in the form of circadian rhythm disturbance, poorer quality and quantity of sleep and increased fatigue. The link between shift work and increased cardiovascular morbidity and mortality has strengthened in recent years. The case for an association with gastrointestinal disease remains quite good. Evidence of poorer work performance and increased accidents, particularly on the night shift, is persuasive, although individual factors may be as important as workplace factors. Correct shift work scheduling is important and for rotating shifts, rapid forward rotation is the least disruptive option. The compressed working week of 10 to 12-hour shifts is gaining popularity but evidence is too scant at present to suggest there are many long-term health and safety risks provided the rest day block is preserved. Optimal hours for the working week cannot be formulated on present scientific evidence, though working more than 48-56 hours a week probably carries serious health and safety implications. The inherent conflict between the interest of the worker and the enterprise over unsocial hours can be mitigated by improvements in working conditions especially at night and by advice to the worker on coping strategies. Further research is needed on the effects of the compressed working week, as well as the influence of culture, task and gender on any health effects. Studies to define individual characteristics which may cause shift work intolerance would be of great practical use.
延长工作日或轮班工作在正常工作时间之外工作是工业社会的一个现实情况。其经济优势必须与对个体工人的不利影响相权衡,这些不利影响表现为昼夜节律紊乱、睡眠质量和数量变差以及疲劳加剧。近年来,轮班工作与心血管疾病发病率和死亡率增加之间的联系有所加强。与胃肠道疾病存在关联的证据依然很充分。工作表现变差和事故增加的证据很有说服力,尤其是在夜班时,不过个体因素可能与工作场所因素同样重要。正确的轮班工作安排很重要,对于轮班制而言,快速向前轮班是干扰最小的选择。10至12小时轮班的压缩工作周越来越受欢迎,但目前证据不足,无法表明只要保留休息日就存在许多长期健康和安全风险。根据目前的科学证据无法确定工作周的最佳时长,不过每周工作超过48至56小时可能会带来严重的健康和安全问题。通过改善工作条件,尤其是夜间工作条件,并向工人提供应对策略的建议,可以缓解工人与企业在非社交时间方面利益的内在冲突。需要进一步研究压缩工作周的影响,以及文化、任务和性别对任何健康影响的作用。确定可能导致轮班工作不耐受的个体特征的研究将具有很大的实际用途。