Ezekowitz M D, Hossack K, Mehta J L, Thadani U, Weidler D J, Kostuk W, Awan N, Grossman W, Bommer W
Department of Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06510.
Am Heart J. 1995 Mar;129(3):527-35. doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(95)90281-3.
The efficacy and safety of amlodipine, 10 mg, a new long-acting calcium antagonist, was compared with placebo in 103 patients with stable angina pectoris in a multicenter double-blind crossover study. The trial consisted of an initial 2-week single-blind placebo period followed by a first period of 4 weeks of double-blind therapy, which was followed by a 1 week washout period and then a second 4-week double-blind period after treatments were crossed over. Twenty-four-hour Holter electrocardiographic monitoring was carried out in 12 patients at three centers. In the first double-blind period amlodipine produced a significantly greater increase in symptom-limited exercise duration (amlodipine 478.5 to 520.6 vs placebo 484.6 to 485.2 seconds; change +8.8% vs +0.1%, respectively; p = 0.0004) and total work (amldipine 2426 to 2984 vs placebo 2505 to 2548 kilopondmeters; change +24% vs +1.7%, respectively; p = 0.0006) and a decrease in angina attack frequency (from 3 to 1 per week; p = 0.016) and nitroglycerin consumption (from 2 to 0.5 tablets/wk; p = 0.01) compared with placebo. Holter monitoring revealed significant reductions in numbers (amlodipine 4.65 to 2.22 vs placebo 1.84 to 1.54; change -52% vs +84%, respectively; p = 0.06), absolute total area (amlodipine 87.66 to 11.43 vs placebo 5.76 to 35.24; change -87% vs +513%, respectively; p = 0.02), and duration (amlodipine 12.29 to 2.95 vs 1.66 to 7.74 seconds; change -76% vs +367%, respectively; p = 0.008) of ST-segment depressions after treatment with amlodipine compared with placebo. After the treatments were crossed over changes continued to favor amlodipine.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
在一项多中心双盲交叉研究中,将10毫克新型长效钙拮抗剂氨氯地平的疗效和安全性与安慰剂在103例稳定型心绞痛患者中进行了比较。该试验包括最初为期2周的单盲安慰剂期,随后是为期4周的双盲治疗期,接着是1周的洗脱期,然后在治疗交叉后进入第二个为期4周的双盲期。在三个中心对12例患者进行了24小时动态心电图监测。在第一个双盲期,与安慰剂相比,氨氯地平使症状限制运动持续时间显著增加(氨氯地平从478.5秒至520.6秒,安慰剂从484.6秒至485.2秒;变化分别为+8.8%和+0.1%;p = 0.0004),总工作量增加(氨氯地平从2426至2984千克力米,安慰剂从2505至2548千克力米;变化分别为+24%和+1.7%;p = 0.0006),心绞痛发作频率降低(从每周3次降至1次;p = 0.016),硝酸甘油消耗量减少(从每周2片降至0.5片;p = 0.01)。动态心电图监测显示,与安慰剂相比,氨氯地平治疗后ST段压低的数量(氨氯地平从4.65降至2.22,安慰剂从1.84降至1.54;变化分别为-52%和+84%;p = 0.06)、绝对总面积(氨氯地平从87.66降至11.43,安慰剂从5.76降至35.24;变化分别为-87%和+513%;p = 0.02)和持续时间(氨氯地平从12.29降至2.95秒,安慰剂从1.66降至7.74秒;变化分别为-76%和+367%;p = 0.008)均显著降低。治疗交叉后,变化继续有利于氨氯地平。(摘要截选至250字)