Suppr超能文献

喘息性婴儿的肺容量测量:体积描记法与气体稀释法的比较

Lung volume measurements in wheezy infants: comparison of plethysmography and gas dilution.

作者信息

Eber E, Steinbrugger B, Modl M, Weinhandl E, Zach M S

机构信息

Pediatric Department, University of Graz, Austria.

出版信息

Eur Respir J. 1994 Nov;7(11):1988-94.

PMID:7875270
Abstract

The accuracy both of plethysmographic measurements of thoracic gas volume (TGV) and determinations of functional residual capacity (FRC) by gas dilution techniques in infants with obstructive lung disease is subject to continued dispute. We studied 25 wheezy infants and compared TGV derived from end-expiratory airway occlusions (TGVEE), corrected TGV after end-inspiratory airway occlusions (TGVEI), and FRC determined by nitrogen wash-out (FRCN2). Group mean TGVEE and TGVEI differed significantly (25.8 +/- 8.4 versus 24.6 +/- 7.1 ml.kg-1). TGVEE and FRCN2 did not differ significantly. TGVEE and TGVEI, as well as TGVEE and FRCN2, and TGVEI and FRCN2 data, respectively, showed lack of agreement. Based on 95% confidence intervals, calculated from TGVEE data, 14 of the 25 infants showed a significantly higher TGVEI than TGVEE; only one patient had a significantly lower TGVEI. Compared to FRCN1 data, TGVEE and TGVEI measurements yielded lower values in at least one third of our patients. The present study illustrates, that there is no gold standard for the measurement of lung volume in infants with airway obstruction.

摘要

在患有阻塞性肺病的婴儿中,通过体积描记法测量胸内气体容积(TGV)以及采用气体稀释技术测定功能残气量(FRC)的准确性一直存在争议。我们研究了25名喘息性婴儿,并比较了通过呼气末气道阻塞得出的TGV(TGVEE)、吸气末气道阻塞后校正的TGV(TGVEI)以及通过氮洗脱法测定的FRC(FRCN2)。组平均TGVEE和TGVEI存在显著差异(分别为25.8±8.4与24.6±7.1 ml.kg-1)。TGVEE和FRCN2无显著差异。TGVEE与TGVEI之间、TGVEE与FRCN2之间以及TGVEI与FRCN2之间的数据均显示不一致。根据由TGVEE数据计算得出的95%置信区间,25名婴儿中有14名的TGVEI显著高于TGVEE;只有1名患者的TGVEI显著较低。与FRCN1数据相比,TGVEE和TGVEI测量值在至少三分之一的患者中较低。本研究表明,在气道阻塞的婴儿中,肺容积测量没有金标准。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验