Suppr超能文献

预期有害刺激时的惊吓增强:主动与被动反应模式

Startle potentiation during anticipation of a noxious stimulus: active versus passive response sets.

作者信息

Patrick C J, Berthot B D

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Florida State University, Tallahassee.

出版信息

Psychophysiology. 1995 Jan;32(1):72-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1995.tb03408.x.

Abstract

The startle reflex response increases during aversive stimulus processing. This study examined whether differing response sets affected startle potentiation during anticipation of an aversive event. Two groups received a noxious noise blast following a 6-s warning cue. Subjects in the active group could press a switch to stop the noise; yoked passive subjects received the same noises with no control. Subjects in a yoked control group heard a soft tone following cue offset. Acoustic startle probes were presented during some of the warning periods and during some of the intertrial intervals. The major finding was that the active and passive groups did not differ in startle potentiation. In comparison with controls, startle reactions for both groups were larger and faster during the warning cue than between trials. The results suggest that the startle reflex indexes defensive response mobilization independently of specific task demands.

摘要

在厌恶刺激处理过程中,惊跳反射反应会增强。本研究考察了不同的反应模式在预期厌恶事件期间是否会影响惊跳增强。两组在6秒的警告提示后会接收到一次有害噪声冲击。主动组的受试者可以按下开关来停止噪声;与之匹配的被动组受试者会接收到相同的噪声,但没有控制权。匹配对照组的受试者在提示结束后会听到一个轻柔的音调。在一些警告期和一些试验间期会呈现听觉惊跳探测刺激。主要发现是,主动组和被动组在惊跳增强方面没有差异。与对照组相比,两组在警告提示期间的惊跳反应比试验之间更大且更快。结果表明,惊跳反射独立于特定任务需求来索引防御反应的动员。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验