Winters J C, Hurwitz D J
School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pa.
Plast Reconstr Surg. 1995 Apr;95(4):755-64. doi: 10.1097/00006534-199504000-00024.
Forty years after its introduction by McNeil and Burston, presurgical orthopedics remains a controversial subject. Although the more extravagant claims for the technique have been dismissed, assessment of its proper place in cleft rehabilitation has been hampered by the poor design of early studies. Furthermore, although the principles of presurgical orthopedics are derived from the venerable tradition of reducing cleft width to facilitate reconstructive surgery, almost all research has focused on matters of dental alignment, cross bites, and maxillary arch form. Not one research paper has ever been published investigating the possible benefits to cleft surgery resulting from presurgical orthopedic treatment. Although it is now generally accepted that presurgical orthopedics does not give significant orthodontic benefits, there are still numerous opinions indicating that presurgical orthopedics does facilitate primary reconstructive surgery for cleft lip and palate. Furthermore, presurgical alignment of the maxillary skeletal base is considered essential to some of the new techniques of primary rhinoplasty.
在麦克尼尔和伯斯顿引入术前整形外科四十年后,它仍然是一个有争议的话题。尽管对该技术一些更为夸张的说法已被摒弃,但早期研究设计不佳阻碍了对其在腭裂修复中恰当地位的评估。此外,尽管术前整形外科的原则源自减少腭裂宽度以利于重建手术这一古老传统,但几乎所有研究都集中在牙齿排列、反咬合和上颌牙弓形态等问题上。从未发表过一篇研究论文来探讨术前正畸治疗对腭裂手术可能带来的益处。虽然现在普遍认为术前整形外科并不能带来显著的正畸效果,但仍有许多观点表明术前整形外科确实有助于唇腭裂的一期重建手术。此外,对上颌骨基底部进行术前排列对一些新的一期鼻整形技术而言被认为是必不可少的。