Suppr超能文献

对无能力接受审判的患者进行非自愿用药:对纽约司法审查经验的描述性研究。

Involuntary medication of patients who are incompetent to stand trial: a descriptive study of the New York experience with judicial review.

作者信息

Ladds B, Convit A, Zito J, Vitrai J

出版信息

Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 1993;21(4):529-45.

PMID:7914440
Abstract

The United States Supreme Court, in the recent case of Riggins v. Nevada, extended its examination of the issue of involuntary treatment with antipsychotic medication to the mentally disabled facing criminal trial. A criminal defendant who is "incompetent to stand trial" cannot be subjected to trial. Many such persons are committed to hospitals to be treated and rendered "competent to stand trial," and some of these patients refuse medication. The involuntary administration of antipsychotic medication to such patients raises important and unique medical and moral questions. This highly controversial issue has been understudied. We report here on the first study of persons committed to a state hospital in order to be rendered competent to stand trial who refuse antipsychotic medication and for whom judicial review is requested to allow involuntary treatment, and in which results are given specifically for these subjects. This is a retrospective study to determine the characteristics of such cases and aspects of their outcome in the hospital. We reviewed all cases (N = 68) of application for treatment over objection, filed since the inception in 1986 of the new laws and regulations requiring judicial review through 1990, among patients in the two facilities that receive over 95 percent of all indicted felony offenders in New York State who are incompetent to stand trial. Tentative conclusions are formulated based on the findings that, according to clinical reports, no patient gave only rational reasons for medication refusal, clinicians always indicated the clinical appropriateness of the proposed treatment, judges apparently never found that someone who is "incompetent to stand trial" is "competent" to refuse medication, 93 percent of patients treated involuntarily had a good clinical response, and 87 percent of patients treated involuntarily were restored to "competency to stand trial."

摘要

美国最高法院在近期的“里金斯诉内华达州”案中,将其对使用抗精神病药物进行非自愿治疗问题的审查范围扩大到面临刑事审判的精神残疾者。一名“无能力接受审判”的刑事被告不能接受审判。许多此类人员被送往医院接受治疗并使其“有能力接受审判”,其中一些患者拒绝服药。对这类患者非自愿使用抗精神病药物引发了重要且独特的医学和道德问题。这个极具争议的问题一直未得到充分研究。我们在此报告对被送往州立医院以使其有能力接受审判但拒绝抗精神病药物且请求司法审查以允许非自愿治疗的人员进行的首次研究,并特别给出了这些受试者的结果。这是一项回顾性研究,旨在确定此类病例的特征及其在医院的治疗结果。我们审查了自1986年新法律法规生效要求进行司法审查起至1990年期间,在纽约州接收95%以上无能力接受审判的被起诉重罪罪犯的两个机构中,所有提出反对治疗申请的病例(共68例)。根据研究结果得出初步结论:根据临床报告,没有患者仅给出拒绝服药的合理理由,临床医生始终表明所提议治疗的临床合理性,法官显然从未认定“无能力接受审判”的人“有能力”拒绝服药,93%接受非自愿治疗的患者临床反应良好,87%接受非自愿治疗的患者恢复了“接受审判的能力”。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验