Suppr超能文献

粘结于瓷质材料上的陶瓷托槽的剪切强度。

Shear strength of ceramic brackets bonded to porcelain.

作者信息

Whitlock B O, Eick J D, Ackerman R J, Glaros A G, Chappell R P

机构信息

Department of Oral Biology, University of Missouri-Kansas City, School of Dentistry.

出版信息

Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1994 Oct;106(4):358-64. doi: 10.1016/S0889-5406(94)70056-7.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare the bond strengths of three different adhesive systems when used alone and combined with a porcelain priming agent to bond ceramic brackets to porcelain surfaces. Sixty porcelain specimens were randomly assigned to the six different treatment groups. Half were bonded with the porcelain priming agent and one of the adhesive systems and the other half with one of the adhesive systems alone. The shear bond strengths of all specimens were tested, with an Instron testing machine, 10 minutes after being bonded. The surface of the porcelain and the bracket base were examined, with scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and qualitative energy dispersive x-ray analysis (EDS), to determine the bond failure patterns and to check the porcelain surface for the presence of cracks and fractures. There was a statistically significant difference within each adhesive between those samples with the priming agent and those without the priming agent. Differences between the three adhesives were not statistically significant (p < or = 0.05).

摘要

本研究的目的是比较三种不同粘结系统单独使用时以及与瓷用底涂剂联合使用以将陶瓷托槽粘结至瓷表面时的粘结强度。60个瓷样本被随机分配至6个不同的治疗组。一半样本用瓷用底涂剂和一种粘结系统进行粘结,另一半仅用一种粘结系统进行粘结。所有样本在粘结10分钟后用Instron试验机测试其剪切粘结强度。用扫描电子显微镜(SEM)和定性能量色散X射线分析(EDS)检查瓷表面和托槽基底,以确定粘结失败模式并检查瓷表面是否存在裂纹和骨折。在每种粘结剂中,使用底涂剂的样本和未使用底涂剂的样本之间存在统计学上的显著差异。三种粘结剂之间的差异无统计学意义(p≤0.05)。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验