Reiter A, Schrappe M, Ludwig W D, Hiddemann W, Sauter S, Henze G, Zimmermann M, Lampert F, Havers W, Niethammer D
Department of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Germany.
Blood. 1994 Nov 1;84(9):3122-33.
In trial ALL-BFM 86, the largest multicenter trial of the Berlin-Frankfurt-Münster (BFM) study group for childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), treatment response was used as an overriding stratification factor for the first time. In the previous trial ALL-BFM 83, the in vivo response to initial prednisone treatment was evaluated prospectively. A blast cell count of > or = 1,000/microL peripheral blood after a 7-day exposure to prednisone and one intrathecal dose of methotrexate (MTX) identified 10% of the patients as having a significantly worse prognosis. In trial ALL-BFM 86 patients with > or = 1,000/microL blood blasts on day 8 were included in an experimental branch EG. Patients with < 1,000/microL blood blasts on day 8 were stratified by their leukemic cell burden into two branches, Standard Risk Group (SRG) and Risk Group (RG). SRG patients received an eight-drug induction followed by consolidation protocol M (6-mercaptopurine, high-dose [HD] MTX 4 x 5 g/m2) and maintenance. RG patients were treated with an additional eight-drug reinduction element. For EG patients protocol M was replaced by protocol E (prednisone, HD-MTX, HD-cytarabine, ifosfamide, mitoxantrone). All patients received intrathecal MTX therapy; only those of branches RG and EG received cranial irradiation. In branch RG, patients were randomized to receive or not to receive late intensification (prednisone, vindesine, teniposide, ifosfamide, HD-cytarabine) in the 13th month. During the trial reinduction therapy was introduced in branch SRG, because in the follow-up of trial ALL-BFM 83 the randomized low-risk patients receiving reinduction did significantly better. Nine hundred ninety-eight evaluable patients were enrolled, 28.6% in SRG, 61.1% in RG, 10.3% in EG. At a median follow-up of 5.0 (range 3.4 to 6.9) years, the estimated 6-year event-free survival was 72% +/- 2% for the study population, 58% +/- 5% in branch SRG for the first 110 patients without reinduction therapy, 87% +/- 3% for the next 175 patients with reinduction therapy, 75% +/- 2% in branch RG, and 48% +/- 5% in branch EG. Late intensification did not significantly affect treatment outcome of RG patients; however, only 23% of the eligible patients were randomized. Prednisone poor response remained a negative prognostic parameter despite intensified therapy. The results confirmed the benefit of intensive reinduction therapy even for low-risk patients. The strategy of induction, consolidation, and intensive reinduction may offer roughly 75% of unselected childhood ALL patients the chance for an event-free survival.
在ALL-BFM 86试验中,这是柏林-法兰克福-明斯特(BFM)研究小组针对儿童急性淋巴细胞白血病(ALL)开展的最大规模多中心试验,治疗反应首次被用作首要分层因素。在之前的ALL-BFM 83试验中,对初始泼尼松治疗的体内反应进行了前瞻性评估。在接受7天泼尼松和一剂鞘内甲氨蝶呤(MTX)治疗后,外周血原始细胞计数≥1000/μL可确定10%的患者预后明显较差。在ALL-BFM 86试验中,第8天外周血原始细胞≥1000/μL的患者被纳入实验分支EG。第8天外周血原始细胞<1000/μL的患者根据其白血病细胞负荷被分为两个分支,即标准风险组(SRG)和风险组(RG)。SRG组患者接受八药诱导治疗,随后进行巩固方案M(6-巯基嘌呤、大剂量[HD]MTX 4×5 g/m²)及维持治疗。RG组患者接受额外的八药再诱导治疗。对于EG组患者,方案M被方案E(泼尼松、HD-MTX、HD-阿糖胞苷、异环磷酰胺、米托蒽醌)取代。所有患者均接受鞘内MTX治疗;只有RG组和EG组的患者接受颅脑照射。在RG组,患者在第13个月被随机分为接受或不接受后期强化治疗(泼尼松、长春地辛(vindesine)、替尼泊苷(teniposide)、异环磷酰胺、HD-阿糖胞苷)。在试验期间,SRG组引入了再诱导治疗,因为在ALL-BFM 83试验的随访中,接受再诱导治疗的随机低风险患者表现明显更好。共纳入998例可评估患者,SRG组占28.6%,RG组占61.1%,EG组占10.3%。在中位随访5.0年(范围3.4至6.9年)时,研究人群的估计6年无事件生存率为72%±2%,SRG组中最初110例未接受再诱导治疗的患者为58%±5%,接下来175例接受再诱导治疗的患者为87%±3%,RG组为75%±2%,EG组为48%±5%。后期强化治疗对RG组患者的治疗结果无显著影响;然而,只有23%的符合条件患者被随机分组。尽管强化了治疗,但泼尼松反应不佳仍是一个负面预后参数。结果证实了强化再诱导治疗即使对低风险患者也有益处。诱导、巩固和强化再诱导策略可能为大约75%未经选择的儿童ALL患者提供无事件生存的机会。