Negri S, Bonetti F, Capitanio A, Bonzanini M
Department of Pathology, Sacro Cuore Hospital, Negrar, Verona, Italy.
Diagn Cytopathol. 1994;11(1):4-8. doi: 10.1002/dc.2840110103.
Two hundred and forty-nine women suffering from breast problems underwent a complete series of tests including clinical examination, mammography, echography, thermography, and fine-needle aspiration (FNA). Ninety-four of these patients were shown to be positive or to have suspected malignancy. Accordingly, they underwent surgical excision followed by histologic examination, while the remaining patients were re-examined after 12 to 18 mo in order to exclude false negatives. The analysis of specificity and sensitivity of every single procedure showed that FNA describes the best degree of sensitivity and specificity but no procedure allows, by itself, the detection of all carcinomas. When considered in combination, clinical examination, mammography, and fine-needle aspiration have a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 49%, and are the best diagnostic tests for a correct assessment of mammary lesions. Thermography and echography showed a low degree of sensitivity and should not be included in the routine diagnostic procedure of breast lesions.
249名患有乳腺问题的女性接受了一系列完整的检查,包括临床检查、乳房X线摄影、超声检查、热成像检查和细针穿刺抽吸(FNA)。这些患者中有94名被证明为阳性或疑似患有恶性肿瘤。因此,他们接受了手术切除并进行了组织学检查,而其余患者在12至18个月后接受了复查,以排除假阴性。对每个单独检查项目的特异性和敏感性分析表明,FNA显示出最佳的敏感性和特异性程度,但没有任何一种检查项目本身能够检测出所有的癌症。综合考虑,临床检查、乳房X线摄影和细针穿刺抽吸的敏感性为100%,特异性为49%,是正确评估乳腺病变的最佳诊断检查方法。热成像检查和超声检查的敏感性较低,不应纳入乳腺病变的常规诊断程序。