Ryan G A, Taylor G W, Moore V M, Dolinis J
NHMRC Road Accident Research Unit, University of Adelaide, Australia.
Injury. 1994 Oct;25(8):533-7. doi: 10.1016/0020-1383(94)90096-5.
In this study, 29 individuals who sustained a neck strain as a result of a car crash were drawn from a group of physiotherapy and general practices and were followed up after 6 months. The aim was to examine relationships between the state of the neck injury at the time of follow up and crash-related factors, notably crash severity and occupant awareness. Crash severity was assessed by measurement of damage to the involved vehicles, while 6-month injury status was established through physical examinations and interviews. No statistically significant associations between crash severity and 6-month injury status were found, but subjects who were unaware of the impending collision had a greatly increased likelihood of experiencing persisting symptoms of and/or signs of neck strain, compared with those who were aware (odds ratio = 15.0; 95 per cent confidence limits: 1.8, 178). While the role of crash severity in the production and duration of neck strains remains unclear, awareness appears to have a strong protective influence and may prove to be a useful prognostic indicator in clinical settings.
在本研究中,从一组物理治疗和普通医疗实践中选取了29名因车祸导致颈部拉伤的个体,并在6个月后进行随访。目的是研究随访时颈部损伤状况与车祸相关因素之间的关系,特别是车祸严重程度和驾乘人员的警觉程度。通过测量涉案车辆的损坏情况来评估车祸严重程度,而通过体格检查和访谈确定6个月时的损伤状况。未发现车祸严重程度与6个月时的损伤状况之间存在统计学上的显著关联,但与有警觉的受试者相比,未意识到即将发生碰撞的受试者出现颈部拉伤持续症状和/或体征的可能性大大增加(优势比=15.0;95%置信区间:1.8,178)。虽然车祸严重程度在颈部拉伤的发生和持续时间中的作用仍不清楚,但警觉似乎具有很强的保护作用,并且可能被证明是临床环境中一个有用的预后指标。