Aul C, Gattermann N, Germing U, Runde V, Heyll A, Schneider W
Department of Internal Medicine, Heinrich Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Leukemia. 1994 Nov;8(11):1906-13.
We have recently proposed a scoring system for risk assessment in primary myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). In this score, one point is allocated to each of the following four parameters: bone marrow blasts > or = 5%, LDH > 200 U/l, hemoglobulin concentration < or = 9 g/dl, and platelet count < or = 100 x 10(9)/l. In a published series of 235 untreated patients with primary MDS, three prognostic groups (group A, score 0; group B, score 1 or 2; group C, score 3 or 4) were identified which differed significantly in both survival and rates of leukemic transformation. The present study was undertaken to reexamine the usefulness of our scoring system by applying it to an independent population of 263 newly diagnosed MDS patients. Morphological subtypes were RA in 53 (20%), RARS in 32 (12%), pure sideroblastic anemia (PSA) in 41 (16%), RAEB in 60 (23%), RAEB/T in 34 (13%), and CMML in 43 cases (16%). The predictive value of the Düsseldorf score could be assessed in 244 of 263 patients (initial LDH levels or platelet counts lacking in 19 cases). Forty-two patients were assigned to group A (low risk), 132 to group B (intermediate risk), and 70 to group C (high risk). Two-year cumulative survival was 86% in group A, 57% in group B and 14% in group C. Five-year cumulative survival was 53, 26 and 0%, respectively (p < 0.00005). Cumulative risk of AML 2 years after diagnosis was 3% in group A, 12% in group B, and 41% in group C (p < 0.05). Additional validation of the score was provided by extended follow-up of the initial patient population on which the scoring system was based. Survival curves in this patient population developed as predicted by the score. An important advantage of the Düsseldorf score is its ability to identify high-risk patients among the RA and RARS subgroups, even though by definition medullary blasts are less than 5%. The inclusion of LDH levels as a prognostic parameter also qualifies the Düsseldorf score for a correct assessment of CMML patients. In the new study population, LDH was confirmed as an important prognostic factor. After 2 years, actuarial survival for patients with LDH levels < or = 200 U/l was 61%, compared with 34% for patients with LDH > 200 U/l. Five-year cumulative survival was 32 and 14%, respectively (p < 0.00005).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
我们最近提出了一种用于原发性骨髓增生异常综合征(MDS)风险评估的评分系统。在该评分中,以下四个参数各得1分:骨髓原始细胞≥5%、乳酸脱氢酶(LDH)>200 U/l、血红蛋白浓度≤9 g/dl以及血小板计数≤100×10⁹/l。在一组已发表的235例未经治疗的原发性MDS患者中,确定了三个预后组(A组,评分为0;B组,评分为1或2;C组,评分为3或4),这三组在生存率和白血病转化率方面均有显著差异。本研究旨在通过将我们的评分系统应用于263例新诊断的MDS患者的独立人群,重新检验该评分系统的实用性。形态学亚型方面,难治性贫血(RA)53例(20%),环形铁粒幼细胞难治性贫血(RARS)32例(12%),纯铁粒幼细胞贫血(PSA)41例(16%),难治性贫血伴原始细胞增多(RAEB)60例(23%),难治性贫血伴原始细胞增多转变型(RAEB/T)34例(13%),慢性粒-单核细胞白血病(CMML)43例(16%)。263例患者中有244例(19例缺乏初始LDH水平或血小板计数)可评估杜塞尔多夫评分的预测价值。42例患者被归为A组(低风险),132例归为B组(中风险),70例归为C组(高风险)。A组两年累积生存率为86%,B组为57%,C组为14%。五年累积生存率分别为53%、26%和0%(p<0.00005)。诊断后2年急性髓系白血病(AML)的累积风险在A组为3%,B组为12%,C组为41%(p<0.05)。对评分系统所基于的初始患者群体进行延长随访,进一步验证了该评分。该患者群体的生存曲线如评分所预测的那样发展。杜塞尔多夫评分的一个重要优势是,即使根据定义骨髓原始细胞少于5%,它也能够在RA和RARS亚组中识别出高风险患者。将LDH水平纳入预后参数也使杜塞尔多夫评分能够正确评估CMML患者。在新的研究人群中,LDH被确认为一个重要的预后因素。2年后,LDH水平≤200 U/l的患者精算生存率为61%,而LDH>200 U/l的患者为34%。五年累积生存率分别为32%和14%(p<0.00005)。(摘要截短至400字)