Held P J, Carroll C E, Liska D W, Turenne M N, Port F K
Department of Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor 48103.
Am J Kidney Dis. 1994 Dec;24(6):974-80. doi: 10.1016/s0272-6386(12)81108-5.
There is an ongoing discussion in the renal community about how to monitor the treatment of hemodialysis patients in the United States. Comparison of the US patient experience to that of other countries with populations of similar health status is one way to assess treatment. Another technique involves examining the level of dialysis therapy US patients receive. This paper reviews recent studies which found that the United States has higher mortality than both Japan and Europe and provides additional information as to why those comparisons might be underestimating the mortality differences. We also examine the data on the level of dialysis US patients receive, both as a prescription and as delivered care. We conclude that US patients receive less hemodialysis therapy than their European and Japanese counterparts, and that in general US patients are not receiving the level of dialysis they were prescribed. These factors are correlated with an increased mortality among US hemodialysis patients.
在美国肾脏学界,关于如何监测血液透析患者的治疗一直存在讨论。将美国患者的治疗体验与其他健康状况相似人群的国家进行比较是评估治疗效果的一种方法。另一种技术涉及检查美国患者接受的透析治疗水平。本文回顾了近期的研究,这些研究发现美国的死亡率高于日本和欧洲,并提供了关于为何这些比较可能低估死亡率差异的更多信息。我们还研究了美国患者接受的透析水平数据,包括处方透析水平和实际提供的护理水平。我们得出结论,美国患者接受的血液透析治疗比欧洲和日本的同行少,而且总体而言,美国患者没有接受他们所开处方的透析水平。这些因素与美国血液透析患者死亡率的增加相关。