Waters R L, Adkins R, Yakura J, Vigil D
Regional Spinal Cord Injury Care System of Southern California, Rancho Los Amigos Medical Center, Downey.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1994 Jul;75(7):756-60.
Assessment of strength using motor scores derived from the standards of the American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) was compared with assessment using motor scores based on biomechanical aspects of walking in the prediction of ambulatory performance. Measurements of strength, gait performance, and the energy expenditure were performed in 36 spinal cord injured patients. The ASIA scoring system compared favorably with the biomechanical scoring system. The ASIA score strongly correlated with the percent increase in the rate of O2 consumption above normal (p < .0005), O2 cost per meter (p < .0006), peak axial load exerted by the arms on crutches (p < .0001), velocity (p < .0001), and cadence (p < .0001). Patients with lower extremity ASIA scores < or = 20 were limited ambulators with slower average velocities at higher heart rates, greater energy expenditure, and greater peak axial load exerted on assistive devices than patients with lower extremity ASIA scores > or = 30 who were community ambulators. We conclude the ASIA motor score is a simple clinical measure that strongly correlates with walking ability.
在预测步行能力方面,将使用源自美国脊髓损伤协会(ASIA)标准的运动评分评估力量与基于步行生物力学方面的运动评分评估力量进行了比较。对36名脊髓损伤患者进行了力量、步态表现和能量消耗的测量。ASIA评分系统与生物力学评分系统相比表现良好。ASIA评分与高于正常水平的氧气消耗率增加百分比(p <.0005)、每米氧气消耗成本(p <.0006)、手臂在拐杖上施加的峰值轴向负荷(p <.0001)、速度(p <.0001)和步频(p <.0001)密切相关。与下肢ASIA评分≥30分的社区步行者相比,下肢ASIA评分≤20分的患者是有限步行者,平均速度较慢,心率较高,能量消耗更大,辅助设备上施加的峰值轴向负荷也更大。我们得出结论,ASIA运动评分是一种与步行能力密切相关的简单临床测量方法。