Larsen B A, Førde O H, Tellnes G
Fylkestrygdekontoret i Hordaland, Bergen.
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 1994 May 10;114(12):1442-4.
The aim of the study was to analyse general practitioners' decisions when certifying patients as sick. The study was conducted among 38 general practitioners in Bergen, Norway, during two weeks in March 1990. The need for certification of sickness was considered for 328 patients. Among these 91% were certified as sick and 9% were not found to be incapable of work. If the patients took the first initiative for certification, 95% received a certificate, while 84% were certified sick when the doctors took the first initiative (p < 0.001). When no objective signs, symptoms or findings were registered by the general practitioners, the patients took the first initiative for sickness certification in 85% and the doctor in 15% (p = 0.001) of the cases. The study indicates that the patients are a stronger controlling element than the general practitioners in the process of certification of sickness.
该研究的目的是分析全科医生在为患者开具病假证明时所做的决定。1990年3月的两周内,在挪威卑尔根的38名全科医生中开展了此项研究。研究考虑了328名患者的病假证明需求。其中91%的患者获得了病假证明,9%的患者被认定能够工作。如果患者首先提出开具证明的请求,95%的患者会拿到证明;而当医生首先提出时,84%的患者会被开具病假证明(p<0.001)。当全科医生未记录到客观体征、症状或检查结果时,在85%的病例中患者首先提出病假证明申请,15%的病例中医生首先提出(p = 0.001)。该研究表明,在病假证明开具过程中,患者比全科医生是更强有力的控制因素。