The role of letters in reviewing research.
作者信息
Kalla G
出版信息
BMJ. 1994;309(6953):539. doi: 10.1136/bmj.309.6953.539.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
The role of letters in reviewing research.
BMJ. 1994;309(6953):539. doi: 10.1136/bmj.309.6953.539.
2
The role of letters in reviewing research.
BMJ. 1994 Jun 18;308(6944):1582-3. doi: 10.1136/bmj.308.6944.1582.
3
Encouraging letters to the editor in EMHJ.
East Mediterr Health J. 2006 Nov;12(6):933-4.
4
Scientific letters.
Nurs Res. 2008 Sep-Oct;57(5):301. doi: 10.1097/01.NNR.0000313496.33025.49.
5
Is lumping peer-reviewed case reports together with non-peer-reviewed comments for publication as letters to the editor appropriate?
Am J Gastroenterol. 2010 Aug;105(8):1901; author reply 1901-2. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2010.219.
6
Are letters to the editor really useful?
Medwave. 2016 Jul 19;16(6):e6502. doi: 10.5867/medwave.2016.06.6502.
7
Commentaries and letters to the editor of the plant cell.
Plant Cell. 2012 Aug;24(8):3172-3. doi: 10.1105/tpc.112.240880. Epub 2012 Aug 24.
8
On Reviewing.
Cancer Biother Radiopharm. 2018 Jun;33(5):167-168. doi: 10.1089/cbr.2018.29003.mwb.
9
Being critical and constructive: a guide to peer reviewing for librarians.
J Med Libr Assoc. 2017 Jan;105(1):1-3. doi: 10.5195/jmla.2017.100.
10
The reviewing process.
J Sports Sci. 2004 Feb;22(2):147-8. doi: 10.1080/02640410310001641476.
本文引用的文献
1
The role of letters in reviewing research.
BMJ. 1994 Jun 18;308(6944):1582-3. doi: 10.1136/bmj.308.6944.1582.
2
Checklists and patient safety.
Anaesthesia. 1990 Jun;45(6):425-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1990.tb14325.x.
Zotero 插件