Gevenois P A, De Vuyst P, Dedeire S, Cosaert J, Vande Weyer R, Struyven J
Department of Radiology, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Hospital Erasme, Belgium.
Acta Radiol. 1994 May;35(3):226-9.
To compare the value of conventional CT (CCT) and high-resolution CT (HRCT) to detect benign asbestos-related diseases, 159 exposed workers with a normal chest radiography were imaged by both techniques. Pleural plaques were detected in a total of 59 cases (37.1%). Ten cases (16.9%) were detected by CCT only and one case (1.7%) by HRCT only. Pulmonary lesions compatible with parenchymal asbestosis were detected by HRCT in 20 cases, whereas CCT showed abnormalities in 45% of these. Rounded atelectasis was equally recognized by both techniques. The results confirm that in a subject with a normal chest radiography, HRCT is a better diagnostic tool to demonstrate lesions of asbestosis. On the other hand, HRCT is insufficient to exclude the presence of pleural plaques. When HRCT does not reveal pleural abnormalities, CCT should be performed.
为比较传统CT(CCT)和高分辨率CT(HRCT)检测良性石棉相关疾病的价值,对159名胸部X线检查正常的接触石棉工人进行了这两种技术的成像检查。共检测到59例(37.1%)胸膜斑。仅CCT检测到10例(16.9%),仅HRCT检测到1例(1.7%)。HRCT检测到20例符合实质性石棉肺的肺部病变,而CCT在其中45%的病例中显示出异常。两种技术对圆形肺不张的识别能力相当。结果证实,在胸部X线检查正常的受试者中,HRCT是显示石棉肺病变的更好诊断工具。另一方面,HRCT不足以排除胸膜斑的存在。当HRCT未显示胸膜异常时,应进行CCT检查。