Lepitzki D A, Scott M E, McLaughlin J D
Institute of Parasitology, McGill University, Ste. Anne de Bellevue, Québec, Canada.
J Parasitol. 1994 Jun;80(3):454-60.
The recovery of metacercariae of Cyathocotyle bushiensis (Digenea: Cyathocotylidae) and Sphaeridiotrema pseudoglobulus (Digenea: Psilostomidae) from Bithynia tentaculata (Gastropoda: Prosobranchia) subjected to 3 methods of storage (70% alcohol, freezing, and fresh) and 2 methods of examination (crushing or artificial digestion) was evaluated. Prevalence and abundance of fully developed metacercariae of C. bushiensis and metacercariae of S. pseudoglobulus did not significantly vary as a result of storage or examination methods; however, digestion of frozen and fresh snails resulted in a significantly lower prevalence and abundance of not fully developed metacercariae of C. bushiensis. Furthermore, freezing or storing snails in alcohol may result in misclassification of the metacercariae of C. bushiensis. Both methods of storage and examination also affected the size of the metacercariae of both digeneans. Although digested snails were easier to examine, there appeared to be no overall gain in time by using digestion instead of crushing.
对采用三种保存方法(70%酒精、冷冻和新鲜保存)和两种检查方法(压碎或人工消化)的短沟蜷(腹足纲:前鳃亚纲)体内的布氏杯殖吸虫(复殖目:杯殖科)和伪球形球肠吸虫(复殖目:裸口科)后尾蚴的回收情况进行了评估。布氏杯殖吸虫成熟后尾蚴和伪球形球肠吸虫后尾蚴的感染率和丰度并未因保存或检查方法而有显著差异;然而,对冷冻和新鲜的螺进行消化后,布氏杯殖吸虫未成熟后尾蚴的感染率和丰度显著降低。此外,冷冻或用酒精保存螺可能会导致布氏杯殖吸虫后尾蚴的错误分类。保存和检查方法均影响这两种复殖吸虫后尾蚴的大小。虽然消化后的螺更容易检查,但使用消化法而非压碎法在时间上似乎并没有整体优势。